All laws must agree with the United States Constitution. If a law does not abide by the constitution, it can be challenged by the Supreme court.
no t can not be challenged.
by allowing unconstitutional laws to be challenged and overturned
The new deal programs that were challenged in court were withdrawn.
Not really. The US Supreme Court is responsible for deciding if challenged laws conform to constitutional mandates. In an ideal world, all laws would be fair and just to everyone. In reality, laws may favor one group and feel unfair to another.
No. The US Supreme Court can nullify a challenged state law if it conflicts with the federal Constitution.
Depending on your state's laws, using a computer surveillance system should be admissible in court. However, make sure there's a time stamp and that the footage could not be challenged as tampered with.
It is when the Supreme Court can overturn Laws Challenged by the Judiciary as Unconstitutional.
Certailnly if it is ultra vires the Constitution or other laws. However, policy decisions of the Government cannot be challenged. For example, if the Government brings in Prohibition in the State, the channege cannot be sustained in the court of law.
All laws and Executive Orders are required to follow the principles of the US Constitution; however, it would be a mistake to think the US Supreme Court "makes sure" this happens. The Court can only review laws and Orders that are part of, or relevant to, a case under their review. If Congress passes a law that is never challenged, and the law is unconstitutional, the Supreme Court can't do anything about it.
The Supreme Court (or any other court) is very unlikely to reverse prior case law decisions. However to directly answer your question, decisions by court of any kind are "final" and require no ratification by anyone. Court decisions may be challenged by new legislation or Constitutional Amendments that try to modify the laws that the court's decisions originally addressed. The court might then have to decide on the new laws and/or amendments, but this would be a new court decision.
She challenged the segregretation laws.