If they are seriously ill, no. If they are able to attend jury with enough strengh to listen and answer questions, yes.
It is possible for a mentally ill person to be prejudiced during a jury trial due to biases or misunderstandings about their condition. However, it is the responsibility of the judge to ensure a fair trial by taking measures such as providing accommodations, educating the jury about mental illness, and monitoring for any potential bias or mistreatment. The defendant's legal representation also plays a vital role in advocating for their rights and challenging any discriminatory treatment.
How should competency be determined for a mentally ill person facing trial?
A psychological evaluation will have to be conducted and the doctor doing the evaluation will determine if the person is mentally capable of committing the crime or mentally capable to stand trial.
A judge presides over a criminal trial, and makes the final decision after hearing arguments from both the defense and the prosecution.
Yes. If the trial has begun, and you flee prosecution, you can be tried in absentia.
They sit at a table separate from the prosecution.
Opening statement: APEX
Actually the answer is false. The burden of proof is on the prosecution. "Innocent until proven guilty".
William Jennings Bryan was part of the prosecution team during the Scopes Monkey Trial.
The prosecutor makes the first opening statement. The defense follows with its opening statement after the prosecution states its case.
The prosecution always carries the burden of proof.
The sides in a civil trial are the same as a criminal trial. There is a plaintiff and a defendant. In a criminal trial the plaintiff is usually the jurisdictioni charging the defendant.
The prosecution of the British soldiers who shot into the crowd of colonists was headed by Samuel Quincy The defense of the British soldiers was headed by John Adams. In a criminal court in the United States the prosecution represents "the people". However, this trial occurred in 1770. Massachusetts was a colony of England during this trial. The prosecution of an English court represents "The Crown". So technically no one represented the colonists at the Boston Massacre trial.