no because the king of the monarchy wouldn't allow the monarch to be democratic.
Growth of national monarchies.
Monarchies affect people by limiting their power and voice in matters involving society. Monarchies are not as popular today as they were in the 19th Century.
monarchies
I am not sure this question can be answered precisely. There might have been 100 or more countries of the Middle Ages, each with its own list of rulers, and each with its own government. There were many kinds of government. These included feudal monarchies, elective monarchies, absolute monarchies, monarchies with parliaments, republican city states, the papal states, and governments run by monastics organizations. Within each kind, there could be many varieties.
France and England?
No, UAE is federation of 7 hereditary monarchies.
Yes, all three are parliamentary constitutional monarchies and are considered 'democratic'.
The only country in Africa with a non-democratic form of government is Swaziland. All the other countries are either republics or constitutional monarchies, which are both democratic governments.
The Benelux countries: Belgium; Netherlands;Luxembourg, are all democratic, constitutional monarchies.
As is the case today, there were many different types of government in existence in the 1930s. Examples include democracies, republics, democratic republics, constitutional monarchies, traditional monarchies, and dictatorships.
The underlying assumption of this question, which is that constitutional monarchies are considered democracies by dint of being constitutional monarchies, is false. "Constitutional Monarchy" simply means that the power of the monarch (king) is limited by a constitution. This constitution can be enforced by some kind of oligarchy, aristocracy, or the common gentry. If the constitution is enforced by an oligarchy or aristocracy, the resulting state is not a democracy, whereas if it is enforced by the common gentry, it is democratic.Now, since almost all current constitutional monarchies are of this latter variety (monarchies with a constitution enforced by common people), people generally drop the intermediate step of separating non-democratic constitutional monarchies from democratic constitutional monarchies and refer to constitutional monarchies as a form of democracy.
No. The current government in Libya is the first that was even quasi-democratic. Libya has been ruled by dictators, monarchies, and strongmen from its beginnings until 2011.
what percent of the world are monarchies
No, even though most of the Nordic countries are constitutional monarchies, Finland has a president.
America and Britian had been tied since the 1607 founding of Jamestown and America to France since the American Revolution. Britain was also the mother country of the US. Also, the Allies were more democratic opposed to the monarchies of the Central Powers.
The True Law of Free Monarchies was created in 1603.
We have to define Head of Government for this. Technically there are two definitions for democratic monarchies like the UK So The Prime minister is the head of government. But so is the Queen.