no they would have to tell you why they want to search the vehicle and they would have to have your permission, unless they have a warrent, but they would have to have more evidence for a warrent than just an informant.
Another View: There is no mention of a vehicle in the question.
The correct answer is YES. If police are working with an informant and you are pointed out to them on the street, they may make a "Terry Stop" on you (i.e.: detain you on the street for a short period of time), and they may perform an outer clothing 'pat-down' of you for weapons while they interview you.
If nothing is developed from either the 'pat-down' or the interview, you will be released to go on about your business. after you supply them with your ID so that they may officially document the Constitutionally permissible Terry stop,
Only if the source of the informant's information is made clear and if the police officer has a reasonable belief that the informant is reliable.
The informant is the person who provided information about the decedent such as full name, date of birth, place of birth, last address, etc. In most cases, it's a family member who provides the information.
There is no special clock because of a search warrant, a search is just another investigation tool.
first yoy need to make a police report and provided them with all the information you have on the suspect and the police will invesigate the incident. just be patient it is a long process. You can start by contacting a private investigation firm and find all the legitimate fraud information on the person. Then, file a formal complaint to your local police informant agency.
depends on what is stated on the warrent
this just happened to me, you can only fight it if the source if information was false, but most cases your screwed because the police are the police and they can basically do what they want because they are the authority of the state, even if they are dirty pigs who are corrupt.
probable cause
just search it up on google
It's a good question. The movie ends with the question pretty much unresolved. What evidence is there that Omar is in fact, as Lopez put it, "a stooly"? We have only the word of Sosa's associate Alberto as evidence that Omar's is a police informant. It was on Alberto's word alone that Sosa gave the order to have Omar killed. Does the movie offer any clues as to who Omar really is? Not very many. Omar is, apparently, the number two man in Lopez's criminal organization. This would be pretty hard, although not impossible, for a police informant to achieve. The first job that Omar assigned to Tony, the drug deal gone bad at the Sun Ray Motel, may have been a trap set up by Omar. If it was a trap then clearly Omar did not expect Tony to survive the encounter, and this would be further evidence that Omar was not a police informant, but was instead a criminal out to eliminate his new rival. It is clear that Lopez did not think that Omar was a police informant. Quote: "You want me to believe that Omar was a stooly because Sosa said so? You bought that line?". This would lead one further to believe that Omar was a "legit" criminal. In my opinion, with the exception of the claim from Alberto that Omar was a police informant, all other evidence in the movie, albeit circumstantial, would suggest that Omar Suarez was a legit member of Lopez's criminal organization just as he appeared to be.
Employment records are a public domain document. Anybody can access employee information under the Freedom of Information laws, not just the police.
No. It is a police contraction for Be On the LOokout.Not really, you are just looking for some one you may want information from.
NO. He can search your car if he has just cause without a warrant.
Sure. Just call the police and they can tell you.