On what have you based this assumption? I don't know anyone who "pays less" for food except for people who grow their own or spend a lot of time collecting coupons.
----------
In reality, because they CAN. Get it? -They CAN their own foods-
people don't have enough money because they either don't have jobs or they are to poor
The food for rich is poor people(their mind and body) and for poor people whatever they afford to get,not when they are hungry but when it is available.. By-Sagar
Kenya cant afford junk food, becuase they are poor
Africa has lots of poor people so some of them can't afford food, so they can't fast
Oxfam helps people with no food,water or even clothes. They ask people to send unwanted clothes to the people in other countries that ate poor, can't afford food,water and clean clothes. .
Yes.
the people who were poor had the best diet because they could not afford rich meat they could only afford veg and fruit. So poor had the best diet.
Since the dawn of man people who were better off have always lived better and apart from the poorest people. They could afford the food, best locations, and had the power.
poor people couldnt afford things that could help them to survive x
No, The people in Britain know that Linux is the way to go.
Wealthy people can better afford knowledge, foods, shelter, transportation, clothing, and medical treatment than poor people.
Because the world does not work as one. People have pets because they need or want them and they can afford them, people that are starving are doing so because they can not afford food. The fact is the world is not a perfect place nor can it ever be, the rich will continue to be rich, the poor will continue to be poor, that's the way it is.
None. A villa was a luxurious country estate and poor people could never afford them.