no Science will focus on an answer based purely on empirical evidence. i.e if you cant see, hear, touch, taste, smell, observe, record and evident it. Then it can't be real. as well as seek to disprove any claims that religion may propose toward there being any actual physical evidence.
Most religion will focus on the entirely intangible, claiming that Pure faith is the only way to God. In truth there is no real way to know except to find evidence where you can see it in the physical realm and let faith get you the rest of the way, Science and Religion can work hand in hand with both allowing for the existence of God.
Religion and science, at least in the absolute sense(where it is assumed that having religious believes is a form of non-education) are incompatible. Religion offers certainty where none exists, science finds new ways to prove itself wrong.
The absence of matter exists only in a vacuum. Modern science has revealed the exists of anti-matter. However, it could be debated on whether anti-matter is actually considered a form of matter, or the exact opposite of matter.
It hasn't. Untestable claims are not science, and the time devoted to them are philosophy time, not science time.
Yes and it exists. It is called political science.
We have fictional science that exists right now, like Creationism. It is possible to live in a world in which fictional science exists, but it will not be accurate.
Yes and it exists. It is called political science.
DARREN McFadden
All of them.
NO
Since there is no permanent population on the continent, no 'predominant religion' exists.
Science exists to explain natural phenomena.
Yes.