Except in an unusual circumstance, no; that would be called double jeopardy. If there are additional or alternate grounds for a federal offense being charged, then yes, they could conceivably be charged with a corresponding federal offense.
- - - - - - - -
However, this is rare since any additional evidence or testimonies would be exculpatory; meaning "after the fact" or like hidden evidence that the defense attorney would argue should've been given prior to trial.
Added: I'm thinking specifically of certain federal cases involving so-called "violations of civil rights," when a state jury found defendants not guilty of criminal charges of assault (or whatever), and the feds stepped in and prosecuted the state-acquited defendants in federal court for the same incident because the Justice Department didn't find the state outcome to be to their liking.
Not with the exact same charge, but he could be charged under a different statute for the same criminal act.
Yes. Why did you think the judge couldn't?
Whichever court you are being tried in determines your sentence.
You can't be tried for the same crime twice; that would be "double jeopardy." If you are found not guilty in state court, you can be tried in federal court for the same incident under a different theory, depriving someone of his civil rights, e.g.
Factual guilt is when someone is guilty of an act, but not found guilty in court.Technical (procedural) guilt is when someone is guilt of an act and found guilty in court.
If you weren't sentenced at the time of the verdict, and are still "out" on recognizance or bond, you will receive a notice of your sentencing hearing.
No. The police enforce the laws. The court decides whether someone is guilty or not.
what is the minimum amount you can sue someone at a federal level
Not necessarily - just someone who is admitted to practice before the court in question.
I'm sure that it's possible that someone may keep these kinds of statistics would have to cover virtually ALL the federal court system which encompass several hundred courts of all types. On a preliminary search I find nothing readily available.
because the federal development system was not counted as being a federal court so they count it as not being one of the actual federal court system of the untied states
Presentation of evidence and testimony to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
You can be factually guilty without being legally guilty. You may have actually committed the crime, but if it can't be proven in a court of law you aren't legally guilty.