As a general rule, the answer is yes, provided that it was done from a public street or sidewalk. Anything viewable from a public right-of-way is permissible. HOWEVER - if the picture taking incidents rose to the level of some type of harassment, the legal picture could change.
We hired a company to repair our sailboat. They damaged the boat in the process. They also photographed the boat with the boat name visible and posted it to there facebook page as advertisement without our knowledge or consent. Is this legal?
You can photograph people in public without their permission for any reason you want.
A tresspasser; the act of tresspasing
His gate-yes. Just as you can trim tree branches extending over your property without permission even if the tree is planted on someone else's property.
Yes, walking through a yard without permission can be considered entry without permission, especially if the property owner has not given explicit consent for someone to be on their property. It is considered trespassing and can result in legal consequences.
No. However, if they are on your property without permission when they take the picture, that could be considered trespassing.
Not necessarily, if it was just a general picure of people in a crowd. However, if the photo is to be used commercially (or in ANY money-making-type of endeavor) you MUST obtain a "release" from them allowing you to use. it.
The meaning of the word property is indicating an object that belongs to a person. If one says that a person intrudes into someone's property, that means they have entered without permission (the house is the property).
The meaning of the word property is indicating an object that belongs to a person. If one says that a person intrudes into someone's property, that means they have entered without permission (the house is the property).
If he is on official business and the other person is part of that business, yes they can.
By the strict letter of the law yes it would be an infringement if you used the photograph without permission. Although you own the property in question the photographer owns the rights to his expression of that property.
No, not if the someone owns the horses and feeds them without the permission of the owner. That would be trespassing.See related question for a different perspective.No, not if the someone owns the horses and feeds them without the permission of the owner. That would be trespassing.See related question for a different perspective.No, not if the someone owns the horses and feeds them without the permission of the owner. That would be trespassing.See related question for a different perspective.No, not if the someone owns the horses and feeds them without the permission of the owner. That would be trespassing.See related question for a different perspective.
You won't get a traffic ticket, but you can be cited for trespassing, and the property owner can have your car towed.