If you mean selling it to one person, then a second person, when the first person still owns it, then no, as the first person you sold it to will have all the deeds, and the legal ownership of the house.
Answer/ClarificationIf you sold your property and the buyer recorded the deed then you no longer own the property and any subsequent deed would be null and void. You couldn't sell it again because you are no longer the record owner. Once a new deed is recorded the property has a new record owner.
However, if the buyer failed to record their deed and you sold the property to another person who didn't know the property had already been sold and that second buyer immediately recorded their deed, then your first buyer would have a serious problem.
Every state in the United States has its own recording statutes that address the recording in the land records of written instruments that affect the ownership of real property. There are three types of recording statutes: race, notice and race-notice. The purpose of the recording statutes is to give notice to the community that there has been a change in ownership or that there has been an encumbrance made against the real estate.
Under the race process the priority of ownership in the case of more than one grantee would be determined by the first to record their deed. That priority would also apply in the other two types of recording statute states as long as the successive grantee was not given notice that the land had already been conveyed or encumbered.
In practical terms this means that if an owner of land conveyed the property to two different grantees with the first not recording their deed, the second would own the property if they recorded their deed and if they had no notice of the first deed. The first grantee who didn't record their deed would only have a monetary claim against the grantor, they would not own the land. They would need to sue the former owner in court to recoup their purchase price.
When they get out of jail for selling property with a lien on it, and after YOU pay off the loan, you might consider NOT co-siging again.
You have to buy the property from someone. And the only person that can sell it is the executor.
You can sell your real property if there is a conveyance title in someone else's name, but the money will not legally be yours. The money will belong to the person who has the title.
You can sell anything on land you own or someone's property (if they let you)
No. Just Give it back to them if they don't want it sell it.
In Colorado, the spouse who received the property through a quitclaim deed can generally sell the property without the other spouse's permission if they hold the title solely in their name. However, it's important to review the specific circumstances of the quitclaim deed and consult with a legal professional to fully understand the rights and obligations related to the property.
Nothing, they are quite entitled to sell any property that they have inherited. Once they have inherited it, it becomes their property to do with as they wish.
Real property can only be sold by the executor of the estate. A beneficiary is not allowed to sell the property.
Not legally. In order to sell real property, someone has to have the authority to do so. Without a letter from the probate court, such a transfer would not be legal.
It could cause the property value to be assessed again.
No, you cannot sell real property on someone else's property without the owner's permission. Real property is defined by its boundaries, and selling it requires clear title and rights to that property. If you attempt to sell property that you do not own, you could face legal consequences, including claims of fraud or trespass. Always ensure proper ownership and rights before any transaction.
In most states a real estate license is needed in order to sell property owned by someone else. A real estate agent sells someone else's property for a commission, as a service provided to the seller. Anyone can sell her/his own property without using an agent. So the owner of a building company presumably owns the property he builds, and can therefore sell it without a license.