No, the US Supreme Court can't serve a dual role as both plaintiff and judiciary. Legislation may only be challenged by people or entities that are directly, significantly, and negatively affected by a law, and must have a grievance that can be remediated by the courts. The courts themselves do not challenge laws.
plaintiff
A plaintiff is a person who brings an action against another in a court of law
supreme court's decision is the fynal decision. supreme court can ineterpret the law. supreme court hav a right to punish the personif he/she breaks the law.
No, the Supreme Court has no part of the law making process. If someone challenges the validity of a law, it may end up in the Supreme Court.
No the Congress can not nullify a ruling of the Supreme Court. The Congress would have to rewrite the law which the Supreme Court had declared unconstitutional. Then the new law could overrule the Supreme Court IF the new law was declared constitutional if/when appealed.
an appeal court is when the defendant or plaintiff is not happy with the results of the case , so they ask for a retrial in a higher court of law. A traditional federal court of law, you have a defendant and a plaintiff, fighting against each other civilly over an issue
No, not in the United States. Supreme Court decisions create common law.
Its by the Supreme Court.
It allowed the Supreme Court to overrule an unconstitutional law.
In a case before the Supreme Court, the law itself is on trial and the justices determine whether the law is guilty of violating the Constitution, which is the supreme law of the land.
The supreme court
The supreme court