Is this a possibility or a morality question? If possibility, yes. If morality, it is much more complicated and could go either way.
yes. physics study mainly how things move.. hence without physics there wouldn't be good missles , no rocket launchers , and noting to guide a nuclear bomb
Historically the have done so.
There is no specific name for people who create nuclear weapons.
We don't create it, We harness it, The uranium exceeds above 3000 degrees and explodes.
The radioactive elements plutonium or uranium are the elements that are used in nuclear weapons that create nuclear fission. Isotopes of hydrogen are used in nuclear weapons that create nuclear fusion.
Yes, Nuclear weapons create the biggest man-made explosions
it does not create new types of bomb simply renews the ones they have got
As a defense against the possibility that Nazi Germany would create them.
Because they were afraid that the Germans were making them.
Well their are no disadvantages to nuclear plants, if your using them for nuclear power, as nuclear power is the safest type of energy in modern times. However disadvantages of nuclear weapons include well the ending of the planet, the possibility of it being stolen by terrorists or even it being spied on for another nation so it can create nuclear weapons.
Countries with nuclear weapons often push for non-proliferation to prevent other nations from acquiring such weapons. While each country has sovereignty, there are international agreements like the Non-Proliferation Treaty aimed at preventing the spread of nuclear weapons. It is generally in the global interest to limit the number of countries with nuclear capabilities to maintain stability.
Hardly. Great Britain and Canada were the only two countries with which the US shared the secret of nuclear weapons. Soviet spies stole the knowledge from the US to create their own nuclear arsenal in 1948. Other WMDs, chemical and germ weapons, were developed independently.