No, upon taking office, the president swears that he will uphold, protect and defend the U. S. Constitution, but even if he hadn't, such a thing would still be treasonous. Besides, all treaties must be approved by Congress.
bohzo (hello) If you go to Pokagon Times blog you can see the actual Potawatomi treatys.
if you mean between countries than MP's do or ambassadors.
yes to settle debts of war and other treatys.
Yes
yes there were Caleb said that he doesn't know all of them but that there were some & more than one
The government formed alliances by signin treatys such as the SEATO and ANZUS Treaty
its where people approve over treatys. just kidding just wanted to be like all the other people who tried to answer this but never gave a good answer
treaty of pairs 1782! the date is important because there are several difffernt treatys of praris I believe it was the Treaty of Paris 1783.
because of economic treatys other countries were forced to after Germany used the assasination of archduke ferdinad as a reson to go to war.
the world has treaty's because, treaty's keep the peace, without them the world would be a war ground, people trying to take what other people have.. treaty's are a very very good thing:)
Getting through his 2 terms of office without being assassinated
Before becoming president, Jefferson favored a weak central government and a strict and limiting view of the constitution. He wanted the common people to hold the political power, and favored progress through trial and error. He was pro agriculture annd was against having a National Bank and standing armies. When he became president, he pardoned the prisoners of the Sedition Acts (they stated that anyone who impeded the polices of the government or falsely defamed its officials would be liable to a heavy fine and imprisonment) and did away with the excise tax on whiskey. Actions like this show that he did stay true to his values to an extent. However, when he made the Louisiana purchase, he did technically betray his idea for a strict interpretation of the constitution, because the constitution didn't specifically give him that right. He excused the action by saying that it was a treaty with France, and he had the right to make treatys, which somewhat mollified his political party. Jefferson knew that the Louisiana purchase was too good to pass up, but he overstepped his own ideals in buying the land. How drastically Jefferson changed is largely a matter of opinion and dependent on which examples you choose to examine and how you interpret his actions. It is probably most accurate to accept that there is justification for both arguments and therefore say that Jefferson changed his political views moderately, possibly because his political view was too idealistic to be plausible.