This is quite a deep philosophical question! The answer may well be subjective but I would suggest that they can be.
In philosophy there are two types of knowledge known as "a priori" & "a posteriori".
A priori knowledge is independent of experience. That is to say that it can be determined by pure reason (i.e. thinking) alone. An example might be: If I told you that A was bigger than B and that B was bigger than C, you could reason that A was therefore bigger than C.
A posteriori knowledge can not be known purely by rational thought. It requires experience/empirical evidence to test its truth. For example: If I told you that I was taller than you, we could not determine the truth of this statement purely by thought alone; we would need to measure our heights.
The above examples may not be the best that could be given but hopefully they show the difference. It should be up to you to determine if you agree completely with this. If you do then the answer to your question is that we can learn a priori knowledge purely by thinking.
Thinking and learning are related but not the same. Thinking involves processing information in the mind, while learning is the acquisition of new knowledge or skills. Thinking can involve reflecting on what we already know, whereas learning typically involves actively acquiring new information.
Learning involves acquiring new knowledge or skills, while thinking involves processing information and generating ideas. Therefore, learning can be seen as a result of cognitive processes such as thinking, as it often involves comprehending, analyzing, and applying new information.
Thinking about your thinking refers to metacognition - the ability to reflect on and be aware of your own thoughts. It involves monitoring and controlling your cognitive processes, such as problem-solving or decision-making. This self-awareness can enhance learning, problem-solving, and overall cognitive performance.
Memory plays a crucial role in developing higher-order thinking skills. It provides the foundation for critical thinking, problem-solving, and creativity by allowing learners to draw upon past experiences and knowledge to make connections and form new ideas. While memory alone is not sufficient for higher-order thinking, it is a key component in the learning process.
This phrase means that blindly going through the motions of learning without reflecting on the material will not result in true understanding or retention. Likewise, thinking deeply about a topic without the necessary knowledge or background can lead to misunderstandings or errors. It emphasizes the importance of both active learning and critical thinking in the learning process.
Humanism is a philosophy that emphasizes the value, agency, and potential of human beings. It focuses on individual growth, self-actualization, and personal development through critical thinking and learning from experience.
I was thinking the same question
Is a duck the same thing as a dog
cghg
I was thinking the same thing
Rote learning can lead to memorization without understanding, limiting critical thinking and problem-solving skills. It can also result in difficulty applying knowledge to real-world situations. Additionally, it may hinder creativity and innovation because it focuses on repetition rather than comprehension.
Omg i learning the same thing!
They may be thinking the same thing
yes, because without thinking learning cant taught .... cherry
Cognitive factors refer to mental processes involved in learning and problem-solving, such as memory and attention. Metacognitive factors involve awareness and regulation of one's cognitive processes, including planning, monitoring, and evaluating one's own thinking. Both cognitive and metacognitive factors play crucial roles in academic success and effective learning strategies.
i was thinking the same thing
I am thinking the same thing... I think I will you should
No one apparently is quite sure. I was thinking the same thing.