Want this question answered?
ye it is required to make the day an official signning date of the document
The job of the notary is to verify that the person signing a document is who they say they are. Some documents require that the notary see the actual signing and some merely require the notary to verify ID. The legal ramifications of an improper or invalid notarization are that the document can be challenged more easily in court, may be completely invalid without a proper notarization, the notary could be sued/fined/charged for improperly notarizing a document, the transaction may be declared void, and other bad things.
A legal document must be signed and properly executed in order to have any legal effect. You should consult with an attorney who can review your situation and explain your options.
An attestor is simply a witness, someone who 'attests' to the truth of some matter. For instance, a notary public attests to the identity of a person signing a legal document by signing and affixing their seal to the document. Therefore, the notary is an attestor to the identity of whomever signed the document. This negates the need of all parties affected by the document to be present during the signing. The notary is not attesting to the truth or accuracy of the document itself, but only that the person signing the document provided sufficient evidence of their identity to them.
Notarize and place it in case file
The abbreviation Its in a legal document means the title that the person signing the document holds in a firm. This is applicable only when you sign a document on behalf of a corporation and not as an individual.
You need to review the terms of the particular trust in order to determine what the trustee can and cannot do. A trustee has only the powers set forth in the trust document. Generally, a trustee should bot take money from the trust for his/her own use.You need to review the terms of the particular trust in order to determine what the trustee can and cannot do. A trustee has only the powers set forth in the trust document. Generally, a trustee should bot take money from the trust for his/her own use.You need to review the terms of the particular trust in order to determine what the trustee can and cannot do. A trustee has only the powers set forth in the trust document. Generally, a trustee should bot take money from the trust for his/her own use.You need to review the terms of the particular trust in order to determine what the trustee can and cannot do. A trustee has only the powers set forth in the trust document. Generally, a trustee should bot take money from the trust for his/her own use.
You are a witness to the signing of a signature on the document and nothing else, (unless it is stated that you are a witness to something else involved with the legal matter directly above where you will sign the document as the witness.)You do not have to know what the document says, what or who it is about, or anything else about the document in order to be a witness to the signing of the document.You are only a witness to the 'original signature' that was signed on the document and could be asked to verify the original signature, as well as your own signature, by anyone involved in the legal process.I would recommend you Do Not ever sign as a witness unless you are certain the signature is valid and it was signed in front of you.
Not if they want the divorce decree to be legal and they could be charged with perjury by signing the divorce petition as it is a legal document.
If you both agreed to the change by initialing or signing next to it, the change is legal. You could also agree to the change by exchanging emails confirming the change, or signing some other document describing the change. This would make the change legal. However, if the landlord simply changed your lease without your written agreement, the changes are not valid or legally binding.
Legal may not be the term you want. Presuming the order itself isn't for something illegal, and the topic is for something the trustee is authorized to handle, its fine. But if you mean is a document with typing and grammar errors enforceable - YES, absolutely. An error that is substantial to the degree of making it so it is not able to be understood may be a different issue. Virtually no legal docs, from Supreme Court findings to the laws themselves don't have errors.
Yes. Signing a document proves that the signer has read and agrees to the terms on the document. A written document that has been signed by both parties as well as being witnessed by a neutral third party will be enforceable and binding on the parties.