We know that einstein theory of general relativity is composed of different parts,but they are all related.If we break down into parts it will not have true sense or meaning.The different parts are all needed to help each other.Its more like an egg.There is the shell,the white part and the yolk.They are all part of an egg but we can never say that only the yolk or the shell or the white part is the egg.Both the shell and the yolk also cannot be said as a true egg.Only when the shell,the white part and the yolk are in combination it is a true egg.Just like that relativity is also a single theory made of different parts.So relativity cannot be break down into parts.When all the parts are combined we have one brilliant theory.RELATIVITY.
They're not false exactly, but become inaccurate and break down at high velocities (of the order of the speed of light). Einsteins theory of special relativity prooves this.
The black hole is unique because it is the only force in the unniverse to rip space time and break through the theory of relativity
Distance reduces to zero, volume reduces to zero, density increases to infinity. This makes the equations unsolvable.
While the equations of classical general relativity indicate a singularity at the origin of cosmic time, this conclusion depends on several assumptions. Moreover, calculation based upon the Theory of General Relativity break down during this condition of singularity, before the Universe reaches the Planck temperature. However a more correct treatment of quantum gravity may avoid the would-be singularity. Still the varied proposals for a more correct treatment of quantum gravity are just as hypothetical as the employment of the singularity.
Fools rush in where angels fear to tread... I am not about to suggest that I know a flaw in any theory, let alone those of Einstein. They don't call him an 'Einstein' for nothin'. But scientists do point out that Einstein's equations apparently break down at what we would call today a singularity. It seems too that for this and other reasons, Quantum Theory may one day supplant Relativity. It was once thought that Relativity and Quantum Theory could not co-exist; there are now some possibilities that they can be reconciled. Whether or not the theories of Relativity are proven wrong, they were central to an amazing burst of insight on the part of many great scientists in the early decades of the 20th century.
No scientific theory can be 100% proven. some are simply more accurate than others. For example, the two most important theories in modern physics today are Einstein's theory of general relativity and quantum mechanics. Both are very good at explaining the known universe in different areas, but when you try to combine them (which we should be able to do if both are 100% correct) they break down and give ridiculous nonsensical answers. This is what physicists are currently trying to do. create one universal theory that explains all. but so far, thousands of years of science and we still haven't created a single theory that can be proven. So there really isn't one way to "prove" a theory. If a theory is good enough, the scientific community will accept it as fact, but so far all our theories have needed to be revised one way or another eventually. In fact, general relativity is just a beefy revision of basic relativity in order to include gravity. Maybe someday we can prove a theory, but we will have to know absolutely everything in not only our known universe, but any other dimensions as well.
At speeds near the speed of light, the formulae from the Theory of Relativity show that there are discrepancies with classical physics - for example, in adding velocities. These discprepancies have been verified by many experiments. In theory the discrepancies arise at any speed, but if the speed is much lower than the speed of light, the difference between classical physics and the more accurate Theory of Relativity is so insignificant that it can be ignored, and you can safely use the simpler formulae of classical physics.
A false theory. Break it down to myth: False. And logical: Theory
In general, one does not aim to 'break' a diamond: it is too expensive for this kind of entertainment value.
Ask Lim Yun Sheng.
report them to the Atorney General office.
1. Hoʻopilikia [ho ohpeelee-kee-ah] (a general break) 2. ha'i (like to break something in two) 3. maha (to take a break)