yes
Since you asked for an opinion I will offer one. No, the child should not have the father's name since it is statistically likely she will have most of the responsibility for raising her child. If the father wanted the child to have his name then he should marry the mother and take full financial responsibility for the child. The mother will always be with her child. That may not be so with the father.Since you asked for an opinion I will offer one. No, the child should not have the father's name since it is statistically likely she will have most of the responsibility for raising her child. If the father wanted the child to have his name then he should marry the mother and take full financial responsibility for the child. The mother will always be with her child. That may not be so with the father.Since you asked for an opinion I will offer one. No, the child should not have the father's name since it is statistically likely she will have most of the responsibility for raising her child. If the father wanted the child to have his name then he should marry the mother and take full financial responsibility for the child. The mother will always be with her child. That may not be so with the father.Since you asked for an opinion I will offer one. No, the child should not have the father's name since it is statistically likely she will have most of the responsibility for raising her child. If the father wanted the child to have his name then he should marry the mother and take full financial responsibility for the child. The mother will always be with her child. That may not be so with the father.
Yes, only Arizona is different.
i have done that. and i am only 16 with a 8month 1day old son. his father wanted to see him and i did not think it was safe so i told him no. so yes a mother can deny the father access to the child.
One would assume the father has access rights and would figure out the child no longer resides with the mother. He will be notified that the child support will be going to a different receiver. see links below
The Child Support Agency sends a form to the mother asking for details about the child's father, it is compulsory for the mother to give these details. It is also compulsory for the father to pay to support their child, I am not sure if there is a way around it. I am quite sure they don't ask any other relatives.
They are considered to be a combination of both.
Mother is a plus child 0 plus what could father be?
Since the father and mother each contribute half (23 chromosomes) of the genetic material needed to form a child (46 chromosomes), the brother and sister are equal in terms of biological similarity, no matter if they had a different mother (same father) or father (same mother). However, if any of the father/mother pairs are related, the result is skewed.
Here in the Philippines, a mother can not just name any person as the father of her child in the Birth Certificate. They will look for a marriage contract as their reference when you named your child under his/her father's surname. Or if not married, they let the father fill up the Affidavit of Acknowledgement/Admission of Paternity at the back of the Birth Certificate.
Only in cases of illegitimate births. Well, the mother can take the child but she can't stop the child from seeing the father. the child deserves to see the father in their life. The father can also take the child back and the parents can share time with the child. Or the child can make his/her own decision to live with the mother or father.
Yes, equal to the mother.