Yes.
This is a valid interface definition in Java:
interface Useless {}
NO, we cannot create a contructor for an interface in java.
maybe
Yes, you can create a static class inside an interface, but it is normally not a good idea.
While not very common an interface in Java can contain a class. Most interface definitions strictly provide an interface and don't include inner classes.An example is the java.text.AttributedCharacterIteratorinterface found in the J2SE API which includes a public static inner class Attribute. The inner class is accessed externally as AttributedCharacterIterator.Attribute.
The system call interface defines all the services of the operating system to the programs. The basis of the different variants of the UNIX operating system is different system call interface. SVID (System V interface definitions ) POSIX standard (IEEE) POSIX 1003.4 is API (Application Program Interface) for the real time systems. www.etherlook.com
By definition, there is no difference. A dictionary will mention as one of its definitions "to create" under defining "procreate".
To create an abstraction or a blueprint for a class to implement later.
by declaring in the header of the class: public/private interface [interfaceName] and do not write any method body(i.e. public void dance();)
The Interface which doesn't have any declarations of methods are called the markable interface (or marker interface)They are named marker interfaces, because their only purpose is to mark special classes.Example:In the Java API there is the interface Cloneable. Since Object already has the method clone() the Cloneable Interface is empty and is only used to mark classes, which objects are allowed to clone.There are Three marker interfaces that are Serializable,Remote and Cloneable.
#Touch newfile Will make an empty newfile
YES
It is to create an opening in the abdomen to empty the small intestine