I guess it depends on the state and type of motion presented.
The way the question is worded it is obvious the questioner wants to make a case that the defendant is being placed in a "double jeapordy" situation, which is unconstitutional. There is this possibility - if the defendant committed the same offense against more than just one individual/complainant, each offense can be charged as a separate and distinct incident.
I think it's i number of it
The use of the word "defendant" implies that the individual is already under arrest and has been charged. In that case: They have the right to counsel, to be confronted by the witnesses against them, and to be tried by a jury of their peers. If convicted, they have the right to expect NO cruel or unusual punishment.
You are asking the court to amend your response to the original complaint brought against you.
This sometimes happens after the judge has already ruled against the defendant. The attorney is attempting to change the judge's mind by providing him with facts that support his or her claims. The final ruling will be up to the judge. Think of it as a last ditch effort.
Not if the case were already underway. You would have file a new or amended lawsuit in order to name the 'witness' as a defendant or co-defendant. it is doubtful that an amended lawsuit would be granted at this point in the proceedings.
because they were declared war!
We have already done something about it in the United States. It is against the law.We have already done something about it in the United States. It is against the law.We have already done something about it in the United States. It is against the law.We have already done something about it in the United States. It is against the law.
A leave to plead is a formal request made to a court seeking permission to file or amend a pleading after the deadline for doing so has passed. It is typically granted at the discretion of the court based on factors such as the reasons for the delay and the potential impact on the case.
Reindictment refers to the process of bringing new or additional charges against a defendant who has already been indicted for a crime. It typically occurs when there is new evidence or legal developments that warrant additional charges beyond those originally filed.
No. Any such action should be reported to the state attorney general.If the defendant has already been sentenced, then the case is adjudicated, completed, finished, over, done with.It would be an impossibility for a prosecutor to alter the entire preceding case and change the charge (after-the-fact) for which the defendant has already been tried and sentenced.If they wished to charge the adjudicated defendant with a NEW offense, then that avenue is open to him.
You can refuse to accept them telling the server that you are not the defendant. If you already have the papers, send them back to the plainitff or attorney and state that you are not the defendant. You must not ignore this. If you do, plaintiff will get a default judgment against you and you will have to go to court to have it set aside. That will cost you money and a damaged credit history.