Asked by Wiki User
SPOILER ALERT! DO NOT READ FURTHER IF YOU DO NOT WANT TO KNOW THE IDENTITY OF THE KILLER IN THE BOOK "A MURDER IS ANNOUNCED".
The character is present through the whole book, but the name and motivation is not revealed until much later. The murderer is Miss Blacklock herself. It is a long and complicated explaination, so if you need more info, leave me a note.
Asked by Wiki User
Probably the citizens of Vatican City, because of the large number of edcucated, scholarly, ecclesiatical, diplomatic and international finance positions held by its 824 citizens where as many as half may be posted overseas at any one time.
Asked by Wiki User
can a council member sue a citizn for defamamtion of charcter (Slander)
Asked by Wiki User
The statute of limitations for medical malpractice in Ohio is one year with the discovery rule.
Asked by Wiki User
It depends on the type of lawyer, who they work for, and where they are located. Government lawyers can make as little as 40,000 a year. Private practice attorneys can do really well if they have a good reputation, and a good practice.
In the long run, money is not a good reason to decide to be a lawyer. Most of us do not make the money necessary to justify the cost of the education.
Asked by Wiki User
:
Yes, of course. The landlord's claim for damages under the deposit is an administrative claim not a judicial claim. If you force a judicial claim by suing the landlord, they are certainly within their rights to counterclaim for everything bad you have ever done to them.
Some of the answers below refer to whether they MUST counterclaim and some of the process for going to small claims court.
:The short answer is "Yes". Anyone can sue for anything but it doesn't mean they will win. Although the rules of court governing small claims matter vary by State, and are generally more relaxed than in larger civil matters, there are certain common threads that run through most of them.
The concept of a "compulsory counterclaim" means one that arises from the same transaction or occurrence as the main claim. Typically, counterclaims of this type must be brought by the defendant within the context of the main claim (that is, within the same suit) or they will be waived. The reason usually given is that of judicial economy so that all claims arising between the parties for the same matter can be adjudicated together.
The concept of a "permissive counterclaim" means one that arises between the same parties to the underlying suit, but it can stem from a different circumstance or occurrence. As such, it does not have to be asserted as a counterclaim and can be maintained as a separate suit. Keep in mind, though, that it has to be brought within the applicable Statute of Limitations, or it will be time-barred
The applicable rules of court are generally available at the county courthouse, and frequently online. Basic forms of pleading are often furnished as well.
Asked by Wiki User
If your job is filled with mold and your employer refuses to take care of it, you need to contact OSHA. If you end up getting sick because of it, you could possibly have a lawsuit against them.
Asked by Mightywatermelon
She is being sued by her former boyfriend and Manager, for several reasons.
The suit filed in a New York Superior Court on 3/17/10, alleges that her former Manager (and boyfriend) discovered and mentored Lady Gaga to her break-out fame. His suit also alleges that he's responsible for the monkier, "Lady Gaga". The suit goes further and alleges the two co-wrote Paprazzi and Beautiful, Dirty, Rich, all of which appeared on her debut album, The Fame.
Robert Fusari, the Plaintiff, admits to having received approximately $611,000 but is claiming that is not his rightful share from their original agreement. He is currently is seeking 20 percent of the mega-star's income as stated in their original contract.
Also, the amount for which Lady Gaga is being sued is $30.5 million as reported by some sources, other sources report the amount to be $35 million.
Asked by Wiki User
You will typically go into mediation and try to come to an agreement. if an agreement cannot be reached it is brought before a judge. If both parties still refuse to come to some kind of agreement it will go to pre-trial.
Asked by Wiki User
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is a federal law that prohibits discrimination in employment on the basis of sex, as well as race, color, national origin, and religion.
Asked by Wiki User
There are many jurisdictions that have varying degrees of liability so any answer will be general and must not be taken to be an accurate answer.
Usually, a landlord has a duty of care to provide safe and reliable electrical wiring in a house. If he fails in this duty, there may well be a liability to make good damage to a renter's equipment. It is usually up to the renter to prove that a faulty installation was the cause of damage and also, that the landlord could be expected to know the installation is faulty.
However, the landlord will not be responsible for property that has been damaged after the renter is aware that a problem exists. To persist in connecting televisions that are damaged due to mains wiring is careless and the landlord will not be responsible for the renter's carelessness.
A blown tv due to the electrical supply would not ordinarily be due to the ground. A loose connection in the hot or neutral contacts in the outlet would be more likely. But at any rate, I agree with the answer above, that after you know of a problem, any damage is on you since you shouldn't be using that outlet.
Asked by Wiki User
The easiest way to stop your boss from yelling at you to retire from your current job and find a new job that has a nicer boss. Let your boss know that you are quitting the job before retiring from that job. If you ever have a really mean boss, this means that your boss needs to know he or she is the only 1 who is making his or herself losing more and more workers and it'll make the company run very bad.
Asked by Wiki User
to save the copy right of mickey mouse
Asked by Wiki User
law suits involve property disputes,breach of contract,family matters (such as divorce). there can also be negligence,and personal injury. a negligence suit is filed when a person has been injured or killed or when a propety has been destroyed because someone else has been careless or negligent.
Asked by Wiki User
No, you cannot sue a minor. You can sue the minor's parents though because they can be held responsible for the minor's actions.
Asked by Wiki User
It would be pretty difficult to make stick. It is, after all, the landlord's property. And I'm sure the lease allows them access to inspect and repair and those sorts of things. But there is also likely to be some wording to the affect of 'reasonable access' and 'prior notice.' And if they were showing up in your bedroom at 2 in the morning, there might be something to it. Trespass is not likely the charge, but there are other torts that might fit the situation better.
Yes, absolutely! While the landlord may "own" the property, he does not "possess" the property while you are the tenant. Thus, entry upon your property without permission or valid excuse is (legally) trespass, and probably also a violation of the lease agreement (if you have one). In many cases you can obtain a rent abatement for every day on which you were denied the value of your property rights (not to mention restitution for any damages caused during the uninvited visit), and you may obtain an injunction to prevent further violations to your privacy.
Asked by Wiki User
Generally the "phrase clock of legislative immunity" refers to the security or immunity of civil lawsuits against a legislative body of government, when such matters occur during their official capacity of office.
Asked by Wiki User
As a general rule no. Children are generally not responsible for a living parents debt. Though if you have a joint checking with that parent the money in the account whether yours or there's is subject to being seized as if it was all there's by creditors. Also if you have ever cosigned for a parent you would be subject to repayment of the debt if your parent defaults.
Asked by Wiki User
You sue a landlord in which ever state you signed the lease and retained the property in. If the landlord resides in Toledo, Ohio and you rent a property and signed your lease in Monroe, Michigan, you sue in Monroe, Michigan.
However, if your lease specifies that any civil proceedings must take place in the landlords state of residency, you're bound by the contract to file suit in the landlords state of residency.
Asked by Wiki User
Actually, the employee must be sued in order for the respondeat superior doctrine to apply. Respondeat superior doctrine only imposes liability on the principal for tortuous acts committed by the agent; the agent must therefore be found guilty of having committed the tort before any liability can be assigned to the principal. S.C., Paralegal Sciences Major, Kaplan University.
Asked by Wiki User
cause could be jail or death pentilty and a efffect is depression for family
Asked by Wiki User
That is not true. I know someone who is homeless because he fell on hard times, he still has a steady income and his ex wants to take him to court to get money he owed, she even has a contract that he signed but she is wondering if it will matter that he doesnt have a current address? Would email be sufficient? What if they have their last address where they rarely pick up mail at? Some homeless people have storages with assets and money. Just f.y.i contributor.
Asked by Wiki User
The 7th amendment was put in to guarantee the right to trial by jury in civil cases. Trial by jury in criminal cases is guaranteed under the 6th amendment. For more comprehensive explanation, seek out Findlaw on your search engine.
Asked by Wiki User
First of all, you have nothing to do but to accept it. You also have to know the pros and cons on the decisions that you will make. Remember, that decision will lead to the success of your company and you will be part of that success once that decision will fall into right place.
Asked by Wiki User
We were at war with Japan at the time.
I do not know of any modern government, then or now, that would allow a country at war with them to have domestic assets. Upon declaration of war, all assets would be seized This is common sense and a common practice of government.
If you are referring to the encampment of Asian people during the war, that is another issue, however, not on the surface how it appears.
WHen the US government seized property and arrested and encamped US citizens was wrong, and caused by fear and public outrage. Remember, that at the time, Japan had just attacked ships at Pearl Harbor, without provocation. At that time, Hawaii was a US territory, and I can only guess that it was a strategic outpost for the US Navy that Japan was not happy with.