A lawsuit of negligence claims that the defendant breached their duty of care towards the plaintiff, resulting in harm or injury to the plaintiff. The plaintiff must prove that the defendant owed them a duty of care, failed to meet that duty, and that this failure caused their injury or harm. Negligence claims are common in personal injury cases, medical malpractice, and various other situations where someone's carelessness or disregard for safety leads to harm.

Copying an original artwork with the intention of fooling a buyer that it is the original

I once acquired a defense attorney. He got a $5000.00 retainer which covered everything but a jury trial. If the case would have gone to trial it would have been an additional $1000.00 per trial day. So per hour could be variable.

can a council member sue a citizn for defamamtion of charcter (Slander)

The statute of limitations for medical malpractice in Ohio is one year with the discovery rule.

It depends on the type of lawyer, who they work for, and where they are located. Government lawyers can make as little as 40,000 a year. Private practice attorneys can do really well if they have a good reputation, and a good practice.

In the long run, money is not a good reason to decide to be a lawyer. Most of us do not make the money necessary to justify the cost of the education.

If your job is filled with mold and your employer refuses to take care of it, you need to contact OSHA. If you end up getting sick because of it, you could possibly have a lawsuit against them.

You will typically go into mediation and try to come to an agreement. if an agreement cannot be reached it is brought before a judge. If both parties still refuse to come to some kind of agreement it will go to pre-trial.

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is a federal law that prohibits discrimination in employment on the basis of sex, as well as race, color, national origin, and religion.

There are many jurisdictions that have varying degrees of liability so any answer will be general and must not be taken to be an accurate answer.

Usually, a landlord has a duty of care to provide safe and reliable electrical wiring in a house. If he fails in this duty, there may well be a liability to make good damage to a renter's equipment. It is usually up to the renter to prove that a faulty installation was the cause of damage and also, that the landlord could be expected to know the installation is faulty.

However, the landlord will not be responsible for property that has been damaged after the renter is aware that a problem exists. To persist in connecting televisions that are damaged due to mains wiring is careless and the landlord will not be responsible for the renter's carelessness.

A blown tv due to the electrical supply would not ordinarily be due to the ground. A loose connection in the hot or neutral contacts in the outlet would be more likely. But at any rate, I agree with the answer above, that after you know of a problem, any damage is on you since you shouldn't be using that outlet.

The easiest way to stop your boss from yelling at you to retire from your current job and find a new job that has a nicer boss. Let your boss know that you are quitting the job before retiring from that job. If you ever have a really mean boss, this means that your boss needs to know he or she is the only 1 who is making his or herself losing more and more workers and it'll make the company run very bad.

to save the copy right of mickey mouse

law suits involve property disputes,breach of contract,family matters (such as divorce). there can also be negligence,and personal injury. a negligence suit is filed when a person has been injured or killed or when a propety has been destroyed because someone else has been careless or negligent.

No, you cannot sue a minor. You can sue the minor's parents though because they can be held responsible for the minor's actions.

It would be pretty difficult to make stick. It is, after all, the landlord's property. And I'm sure the lease allows them access to inspect and repair and those sorts of things. But there is also likely to be some wording to the affect of 'reasonable access' and 'prior notice.' And if they were showing up in your bedroom at 2 in the morning, there might be something to it. Trespass is not likely the charge, but there are other torts that might fit the situation better.

Yes, absolutely! While the landlord may "own" the property, he does not "possess" the property while you are the tenant. Thus, entry upon your property without permission or valid excuse is (legally) trespass, and probably also a violation of the lease agreement (if you have one). In many cases you can obtain a rent abatement for every day on which you were denied the value of your property rights (not to mention restitution for any damages caused during the uninvited visit), and you may obtain an injunction to prevent further violations to your privacy.

Generally the "phrase clock of legislative immunity" refers to the security or immunity of civil lawsuits against a legislative body of government, when such matters occur during their official capacity of office.

As a general rule no. Children are generally not responsible for a living parents debt. Though if you have a joint checking with that parent the money in the account whether yours or there's is subject to being seized as if it was all there's by creditors. Also if you have ever cosigned for a parent you would be subject to repayment of the debt if your parent defaults.

You sue a landlord in which ever state you signed the lease and retained the property in. If the landlord resides in Toledo, Ohio and you rent a property and signed your lease in Monroe, Michigan, you sue in Monroe, Michigan.

However, if your lease specifies that any civil proceedings must take place in the landlords state of residency, you're bound by the contract to file suit in the landlords state of residency.

Actually, the employee must be sued in order for the respondeat superior doctrine to apply. Respondeat superior doctrine only imposes liability on the principal for tortuous acts committed by the agent; the agent must therefore be found guilty of having committed the tort before any liability can be assigned to the principal. S.C., Paralegal Sciences Major, Kaplan University.

cause could be jail or death pentilty and a efffect is depression for family

That is not true. I know someone who is homeless because he fell on hard times, he still has a steady income and his ex wants to take him to court to get money he owed, she even has a contract that he signed but she is wondering if it will matter that he doesnt have a current address? Would email be sufficient? What if they have their last address where they rarely pick up mail at? Some homeless people have storages with assets and money. Just f.y.i contributor.

The 7th amendment was put in to guarantee the right to trial by jury in civil cases. Trial by jury in criminal cases is guaranteed under the 6th amendment. For more comprehensive explanation, seek out Findlaw on your search engine.

First of all, you have nothing to do but to accept it. You also have to know the pros and cons on the decisions that you will make. Remember, that decision will lead to the success of your company and you will be part of that success once that decision will fall into right place.