Want this question answered?
They would definitely not have an adverse possession claim because that requires exclusive and hostile possession of the land in question. However, they may have an easement by prescription (if they have been using the driveway to access their property for a long time) and/or easement of necessity ( if they have no other access to their property).If you find that the neighbors' use of your land is a problem, you should consult with a real estate attorney in your area immediately.
This sounds like an easement "by prescription", but you may be referring to "adverse possession". Can't absolutely tell based on the scanty information.
The term Adverse Selection is also known as Anti-Selection and Negative Selection. Adverse Selection is a term referring to a market process when undesired results happen when buyers and sellers have access to different information.
If you used the driveway entrance with the permission of the land owner you cannot meet the requirements for adverse possession since one of the elements is using land openly and withoutthe permission of the owner.If you have used the entrance unhindered for that length of time you may have acquired a prescriptive right of way. However, that may need to be established by a court order. You should consult with an attorney who specializes in land use law.
One could get an adverse credit secured loan by doing a Search on the Internet to gain access to this information depending on their personal credit history.
no, but if you have 2 accounts you are able to access more accounts due to your time of possession.
"Possession" in the law does not necessarily mean having it on your person. Possession refers to the exercise of your 'dominion' (e.g.: within your power, control, or ability to readily access, something).You may "possess" something by having it on your person, or by its nearness or closeness to you, or by your ready access to it.
No. A felon may not own, be in possession of, or be granted access to firearms.
"Simple" possession refers to the fact that you had the item(s) physically on your person or within your reach and control, versus "concurrent" possession meaning that you were in the vicinity of, and could have had access to, the item(s).
Absolutely they can. It is not necessary to prove who owned the weapon or who was actually carrrying it. The fact is that they ALL had access to it. This is known in the law as "Concurrent Possession."
Even with an adverse credit history, one may still be able to obtain loans through various lending associations. Some of these companies include Easy Financial or Fast Access.
It depends. There is something called "constructive possession" that most people don't understand the concept of. Constructive possession basically means that you have access to and intent to control the firearm. So as I said, it depends. You could be charged with possession.Added: YES, you would be considered to be 'in possession' of it, if you had access to it.