No. No country in the world has capital punishment for the burning of the flag (and flag-burning is often fully legalised, even so far as to be a right). However, in some Islamic countries where the national flags contains part of the sacred writings, the burning of such a flag is construed as an insult to Islam and can have quite dire consequences.
If the country in question labels the burning of its flag as a capital offense, yes. No countries do so though.
It is the highest type of disrespect shown to a country.
Burning the flag is disrespectful, but not a crime.
Yes, there should be legal consequences for individuals involved in British flag burning as it can be considered a form of disrespect towards the country and its symbols.
The Citizens Flag Alliance is an organization that is against flag burning. They are probably the most notable for that side. Veterans against the flag burning amendment, or something to that degree is an organization that supports flag burning.
I'd Rather Be Flag-Burning was created in 1995.
No, contrary to internet myths, they never did. There is no reason why they ever would, since they love this country and respect the flag.
This is an opinionated question. I shant answer it. I simply shant.
No, the Supreme Court ruled in the 1990's that burning a flag is a form of symbolic speech protected by the First Amendment. As long as the flag burning does not endanger anyone it is perfectly legal.
No. The US Supreme Court didn't uphold laws against flag burning; it overturned laws against flag burning on the grounds that burning the US flag is expressive political speech protected by the First Amendment.For more information on the US Supreme Court and flag desecration cases, see Related Questions, below.
Yes, the US Supreme Court has ruled that Flag burning is a protected form of speech.
I don't believe that anyone is "for" flag burning, it is simply protected as a form of free speech and expression.