You would get in the same amount of trouble as if you would've been caught assuming it's not your parent your telling then they would probably give you a slap on wrists and more trouble. :S
Ex Post Facto protects a person from being charged with breaking the law or committing a crime if they committed it before the law went into effect. For example if I committed a crime but at the time it wasn't against the law but they soon passed a law saying that it was illegal they could not come after me for having committed a crime that at that time would not have been a crime.
Of course they should be put to trial because they committed a crime which is a bad influence on the country. I mean really, he/she is the Highest position in the United States and your getting yourself in trouble. Also it may depend on the degree of the crime committed. Other than that yes.
"Crime doesn't pay," is the correct saying.
Lowry is saying to die
Yes they can get in trouble for saying your high in high school
If the court believes their false witness and not yours you could be put in jail. A good lawyer will try to prove the false witness is false.
a crime committed involving fire
Not necessarily, because those others may be guilty by association. For example, if only one person actually robbed a bank but someone else drove the getaway car, the driver would be guilty of the crime by his association with it and helping for the crime to be committed successfully.
depends what crime - and when crime committed.
It is the place where the crime or alleged crime was believed to have been committed.
If you committed the same offense, seperately, in each state, you can be charged with each separate crime. You cannot be tried in IL for a crime committed in IN, and conversely, you cannot be tried in IN for a crime committed in IL.
The perpetrator of a crime is the person who actually committed the crime. A suspect may or may not have committed the crime. A suspect has not been confirmed as being the perpetrator.