If your by yourself u can buy one and place it then u can buy another and place it next to the other or wherever hope this helps
It all depends on what you prefer playing, if you prefer a more realistic game than MW3 is the one you'd go well with. But, if you like games with aliens and stuff like that, then Halo is the one you want
No, Wii can only handle one player in Modern Warfare 3.
MW3 has sold more in the first day than Battlefield 3 will sell. It sold over 12 million just in the USA and UK in the first week.
I would and I already did get mw3 after black ops 2 for some reasons. One thing I have found out is that black ops 2 players are less competitive than mw3. Finally, the main reason I got mw3 is because it has the mode survival, missions, and chaos which is way more fun and challenging than zombies.
You cannot, the Wii can not handle more then one player.
they can get you stuff when you go to the barracks you can get one thing per token and it only starts you with one and you have to prestige to get more of them
mw3 is awesome very awesome for awesome people and this stupid tf2, the gun suck, everything in tf2 is suckish. play mw3, mw3 is the best and tf2 are for noobs and losers
Unless you want to look like a little girl, i would get the MW3 one.
They are both great games. I hate people who are only a fan of one of them. Battlefield is fun and team work based. The campaign in battlefield is cool too. With Call of Duty there is way more of them. In my opinion MW3 is better than BF3. But that's my opinion, but MW3 has survival, BF3 doesn't so there is a huge reason why i like MW3 more. I don't like the mp in BF, its not my style. Call of Duty is my style but still they are BOTH great games so don't argue about which ones better.
Both are better than good and MW3 is the best selling game this month for both consoles
you need two people in forge have one person hold a kill ball the other push the warthog in to the kill ball
Neither have came out yet so it's hard to say. Bf3 has way better graphics and will be more balanced than Mw2. Mw2 will have the same graphics and not much has been improved much since mw3. If you disliked mw3 you will hate mw2. Mw2 will run on 90 frames per second and bf will still be at 25 frames per second on console, 30 on pcds. In my opinion, I really do not know which one will be better. Mw2 seems to have more bad things about it so you would think bf3 would be better but cod is cod and the overall feel to it is better than bf and that's what makes it hard to decide. If you have always been more of a bf fan get bf3. If you have always been more of a cod fan get mw2. If you like both get both! I will be getting both this fall because I like both.