I believe that there is confusion in the questioner's mind over the term "police clearance." As commonly used, that term refers to the record search of the individual's own criminal history. If the individual has a criminal history, the police will furnsih them a copy of it, showing what offense(s) the individual has in his file. If the individual has NO criminal record the police will issue a notice of "No Record On FIle." Hence, the individual will have a "clear" record. Someone who has been arrested, but not convicted, of a crime WILL have a record of the arrest and the reason for it, on flile, thus, that person's record will NOT be "clear."
Being arrested means being taken into custody by law enforcement, while being convicted means being found guilty of a crime by a court of law. An arrest is the initial step in the criminal justice process, while a conviction represents a formal judgement of guilt.
arrested yes convicted no.
If the money is drug related or part of the evidence, they can seize and hold it, and if convicted, it can be forfeited.
"Known to police" typically refers to an individual who has come to the attention of law enforcement due to previous interactions, such as being arrested, having a criminal record, or being a suspect in a crime. This term implies that the person has a history that law enforcement is aware of.
To be arrested is to be taken into custody by the police. To be the accused is to stand trial before a judge.
He was implicated in the crime, so the police arrested him for questioning.He was implicated in the crime, so the police arrested him for questioning.He was implicated in the crime, so the police arrested him for questioning.He was implicated in the crime, so the police arrested him for questioning.He was implicated in the crime, so the police arrested him for questioning.He was implicated in the crime, so the police arrested him for questioning.He was implicated in the crime, so the police arrested him for questioning.He was implicated in the crime, so the police arrested him for questioning.He was implicated in the crime, so the police arrested him for questioning.He was implicated in the crime, so the police arrested him for questioning.He was implicated in the crime, so the police arrested him for questioning.
You can be arrested for anything, or nothing at all. In some states it is unlawful to threaten an animal if it is part of a governmental function (police dogs, bomb dogs, etc.) so you could actually be convicted as well.
"The police arrested me for loitering," is in the active voice. A passive version of this might be, "I was arrested by the police for loitering."
The Miranda decision of the Supreme Court was concerned with police informed the accused of their rights when they are arrested. They are called Miranda Rights.
You need to contact the law enforcement agency that is in charge of your police check clearance letter and inquire there.
Yes, PROVIDING, that you are not applying for any government employment or any job in the private sector which requires a secutiry clearance.
Expressed as a decimal fraction, 5/10 is equal to 0.5.