Want this question answered?
There are few articles that prove an international internship does make you more competitive. Make the case and prove that this is smart decision for future professionals.
It proved that the Articles of Confederation were weak.
There is no such thing in the English language known as a fodsaw. To prove my point further I just typed it in and word has marked it as a spelling error.
English is relatively a very difficult language. It has so many rules and all of them have exceptions. Unlike Spanish it isn't a phonetic language, meaning all of it's word aren't spelled how they sound. It is hard to full master the language, but it is a major language of the world and will prove to be helpful throughout one's life.
Alan J. Stevens has written: 'Test and prove your English' -- subject(s): English language, Japanese, Textbooks for foreign speakers
If your question is, 'could the use of English make you less nationalistic'? I say no. English is one of mediums of expressing your thought, feeling, culture, tradition, and on. If English is the official language of your country, you prove you are nationalistic by using the language. Don't forget we have many variety of Englishes. The spoken English of your country may not be the same in another country. Always feel good and confident speaking English
The Articles of Confederation did not work
Prove .
A second language certification can be very useful with employment and purchasing requirements. This type of certification could also prove useful on a private level when traveling or helping someone who is in need. You can obtain this sort of qualification by completing a technical language course at participating schools or universities.
The biggest piece of evidence there is to prove that man has always had some type of language is the ancient hieroglyphics. These prove that people found ways to communicate with each other.
Rhetoric is the language used to persuade or influence beliefs or attitudes rather than to prove a claim logically. It focuses on using emotional and persuasive techniques to sway an audience's opinion rather than purely relying on factual evidence.
postulates cannot be proved, they are the base of geometry and there isn't anything to prove it with. if the postulates were wrong then all of euclidian geometry would be wrong. that is like saying how do we know the English language is correct, it is the basis for communication and if it wasn't, then how would speaking the language work?