Of course: (See related Link)
But it's a terrible transliteration, the New International Version is a substantially better rendition of the original texts.
Yes, you can read the King James Version of The Bible online. Many websites offer full text versions of the KJV Bible that you can access for free. Some popular websites include BibleGateway.com, Bible.com, and KingJamesBibleOnline.org.
Look in the related link below for some information that may help. However searching the King James version of the bible on line (see related link) does not seem to find 'TEHILLAH' in it!
Simple...just access Strongs Exhaustive Concordance on line and count the references
The quote 'Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned' does not originate from the Bible. The mistake is due to the fact that the King James Version completed in 1611 uses similar-sounding English, and the quote is in a similar format to verses found in the Book of Proverbs. The quote is an idiom that is adapted from a line in William Congreve's play, The Mourning Bride (1697)
Generally speaking, the mere wording of a translation or version of the Bible doesn't necessarily make one 'more acceptable or better' than the other. Rather, works are broken into the following categories:Those most consistently in line with the original Greek and Hebrew would be the King James Bible and the more 'modern' terminology of the New King James Bible. These are called 'word-for-word' translations.Others like the New International Version and the Revised English Version are categorized as 'meaning for meaning' translations and can provide valuable secondary information when having difficulty in a Scripture.Lastly, the least reliable perhaps are the paraphrasing versions like The Living Bible that has as its goal making the Bible easier to read and is at times at the expense of the true understanding of the Scripture.Concerning the Jehovah Witness verison which some consider is an outside version that many believe should be totally avoided. These say that the translators intentionally added/deleted to the source translation terms to suit their own agenda. These believe this is the case with the New World Translation which they say Jehovah Witness parent organization 'The Watch Tower,' intentionally changed the rendering of text to conform to their theology.Their translation of John 1:1 is the most well known change of the original.
The Bible has no line that I am aware of to that effect.
Look in the related link below for some information that may help. However searching the King James version of the bible on line (see related link) does not seem to find 'TEHILLAH' in it!
Primarily those based on the King James version of the Bible are not acceptable. It does not include the apocrypha and has had too many texts altered to fall in line with Protestant beliefs.
swine
Simple...just access Strongs Exhaustive Concordance on line and count the references
In the King James version the word - charitably - appears once the word - charity - appears 28 times
As many times as it is listed in a good exhaustive concordance. You can look one up on line and count the references
King James 1st of England had previously ascended the throne of Scotland as King James 6th. But although he was King of Scotland and so was Macbeth, they were no' related. King James was supposed to be descended from Banquo who was no relation of Macbeth's
In the King James version The phrase 'pure heart' is mentioned 4 times * Psalm 24:4 * 1 Timothy 5 * 2 Timothy 22 * 1 Peter 22
The Gutenberg Bible (also known as the 42-line Bible or the Mazarin Bible) is a printed version of the Latin Vulgate translation of the Bible that was printed by Johannes Gutenberg, in Mainz, Germany in the fifteenth century
What A "Nut Shell' Because This Topic Do Not Line Up With The Scripture... The Tribe Of Judah IsBlack.◄ Jeremiah 14:2 ►King James VersionJudah mourneth, and the gates thereof languish; they are black unto the ground; and the cry of Jerusalem is gone up.Romans 1:25"Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen."King James Version (KJV)
The Bible was written over a period of at least 14 centuries, and it's doubtful that "the original manuscript" for, say, the Pentateuch even still existed by the time the New Testament was being written, let alone by the time the King James translation was started. Bottom line: no, it wasn't. It was, however, translated from what were believed to be valid copies (of copies of copies of copies ...) of the original manuscripts. In other words, the Authorized Version was translated from what was purportedly the original Hebrew (and Greek, in the case of the New Testament), it wasn't translated into some other language, then some other language, then some other language, etc, finally winding up in English.
Psalm 110 is written by King David.AnswerIn line with tradition, the King James Bible attributes Psalm 110 to King David. However, this psalm contains an acrostic in Hebrew of the name of Simon Maccabaeus, proving that it could not possibly have been written before the second century BCE.