To say "more prouder" would be incorrect. Both the word 'more' and the suffix
'-er' are indications of different degrees of the word, therefore both of them together are unnecessary and not proper. Both "prouder" and "more proud" are technically correct, however "more proud" is both the clearer of the two and the most correct.
The comparative form of proud can be in two ways.The morphologic form is prouder. The periphrastic form is more proud.To a lesser degree, these forms even combine in expressions such as more prouder, gramatically accepted.
Instead of saying "more prouder," you should say "prouder." Adding "more" is redundant because "prouder" is the comparative form of "proud."
Prouder.
No, "more prouder" is not correct grammar. "More proud" is the correct form to compare levels of pride.
It would be more accurate to say "faster than him."
To say "I love you more" in Tagalog, you can say "Mahal kita nang higit pa."
To say "I love you more" in Tagalog, you can say "Mahal kita nang higit pa."
Prouder.
No, "more prouder" is not correct grammar. "More proud" is the correct form to compare levels of pride.
Not really. Bad American English has formed such a word. The correct way to say "prouder" in a sentence is "I have never been more proud ... "
it is proud, prouder, and proudest. not most proud, most prouder, or most proudest.
"Pride" is a noun and a verb and as such does not have a comparative form. The adjective "prideful" has the comparative "more prideful", while the adjective "proud" has the comparative "prouder."
because medals make you even more prouder
prouder
I could not be more proud
Louder, Powder, Chowder
prouder, proudest
prouder, proudest
louder* Chowder * Louder * Prouder