No. A civil annulment provides that there was no valid marriage in the first place and the parties are free as if they were never married. Therefore, they have no legal claim to the other's estate.
An ecclesiastical annulment in itself does not dissolve a marriage. It must be followed by a civil divorce.
No. A civil annulment provides that there was no valid marriage in the first place and the parties are free as if they were never married. Therefore, they have no legal claim to the other's estate.
An ecclesiastical annulment in itself does not dissolve a marriage. It must be followed by a civil divorce.
No. A civil annulment provides that there was no valid marriage in the first place and the parties are free as if they were never married. Therefore, they have no legal claim to the other's estate.
An ecclesiastical annulment in itself does not dissolve a marriage. It must be followed by a civil divorce.
No. A civil annulment provides that there was no valid marriage in the first place and the parties are free as if they were never married. Therefore, they have no legal claim to the other's estate.
An ecclesiastical annulment in itself does not dissolve a marriage. It must be followed by a civil divorce.
No. A civil annulment provides that there was no valid marriage in the first place and the parties are free as if they were never married. Therefore, they have no legal claim to the other's estate.
An ecclesiastical annulment in itself does not dissolve a marriage. It must be followed by a civil divorce.
It depends, if the Methodist woman's marriage was annulled in a civil court, or if she was divorced and annulled in a protestant church: it would still need to be annulled by the Catholic Church. The Church *always* defends the bond, except in rare open and shut cases. You need to speak to a priest about this. If the woman's marriage is annulled by the Catholic Church, THEN you must receive permission from the Bishop for a mixed marriage, or she could convert.
I believe in most countries of the world you remain married until the marriage is formally and legally annulled (you get a divorce). Unless you divorced, I believe in California you would still be seen as your husbands legal wife and if he married to start his 2nd family, that marriage would not be legal and he would have committed a criminal offense (bigamy).
You don't buy and estate. An estate is created after death. Yes, there is an estate and it will be distributed according to the laws of intestacy in the state or country in question.
Children of an annulment are still children. The annulment has nothing to do with parenthood. It simply declares the marriage was never valid, but the children of that union are still the children of the parents. The children are never annulled.
A marriage is valid until the parties take some action to end the marriage legally. Failure to consummate a marriage provides grounds for a legal annulment or for a divorce in most jurisdictions in the United States.
Probably; check with a lawyer.
In the United States whether marriage revokes a will varies by state so you must check the laws in your particular jurisdiction. Generally, marriage invalidates a Will made prior to the marriage unless the Will was executed in contemplation of marriage. In a few states in the U.S. a Will remains valid after a subsequent marriage. However, intestate laws in every state give a surviving spouse a share of the spouses estate. Therefore, even if the spouse was not mentioned in the Will made before the marriage, the law would provide them with a portion of the estate of the decedent.
depends on the worth of the estate and if the estate has been paid for and is not still under mortgage. if it is sold your child would have a right to receive a percentage of the profit. its a long process though, you have to provide proof of worth of the estate and all of this has to be given to you by the person who has been handling the estate since your ex's demise.
No. Once someone has a marriage annulled in civil court the parties are free from each other and any subsequent marriage is valid as long as the subsequent marriage took place afterthe first marriage was annulled.A marriage that was entered while one of the parties was still married (which would be the case prior to an annulment) is null and void. A subsequent annulment of that first marriage would not "cure" the second one. The parties must arrange to get married legally.
Definitely, yes. Proposition 8 only affected marriage, not domestic partnerships. In fact, since January 1, 2005, a California domestic partnership is legally identical to a marriage except that it is not called a "marriage."
How could the estate be legally closed if there were still outstanding debts owed? Sounds like someone didn't do the job of running the estate properly. There could be a legal reason for the creditors to ask the estate to be reopened.
In some countries, such as the Philipines, if you are separated for 7 years the marriage is annulled. However, in the U.S.A., you must file for divorce.