0
Can you still say that the Bible is inerrant despite the few amounts of copyist errors found there?
Wiki User
∙ 14y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What does it mean for the Christian's by' the Bible is inspired?
The Christian Church as a whole claims that the Bible is inspired and inerrant. This means that God is the one who moved through the writers to communicate to us the words which God wanted us to hear. This inspiration, however, is not a dictation, but a movement of God's spirit through the writer, utilizing the personality and style of the writer. Inerrancy means that all that is written in the inspired documents is without error. Now, there is a comment worth mentioning here. Inspiration and inerrancy applies to the original writings, not to the copies. In other words, it is the original writings that are without error. The copies, sadly, have copyist errors in them.
Why do you think God would allow a few copyist errors to creep into the Holy Bible?
None of the copyists errors that crept into the Holy Bible change God's message. Still, they let you know that while the Bible is true it is not perfect. God does not want you to worship the Bible. God wants you to worship him. If people thought the Bible was perfect, they might worship the Bible instead of worshipping God.
Can a trial balance usually has no mathematical errors if the total debit amounts equals total the credit amount?
no
Is the Holy Bible inerrant?
Some regard the Bible as inerrant - totally without error or contradiction. Others, more practically regard the Bible as infallible - containing possible errors or contradictions on matters of history and the natural world, but not on matters of faith. Calling the Bible inerrant means that the Bible contains no error of fact or transcription. This means that if any historical error or other error of fact is found in the Bible, then the entire belief in its inerrancy must be called into question. If the belief in the Bible's inerrancy is applied to an English translation of the Bible, this applies even to errors of translation. Some say that this rule for inerrancy is too broad and that the Bible contains exactly what God intends to convey, but the absence of error does not necessarily apply to the incidental, scientific, geographical, or historical statements in Scripture. Professor Alley of the University of Richmond is quoted as saying, "While some persons may continue to hold that the historic Christian belief in biblical infallibility and inerrancy is the only valid starting point and framework for a theology of revelation, such contentions should be heard with a smile and incorporated into the bylaws of the Flat Earth Society."
How much of the Bible was inspired by God?
For the Bible to be inspired by God, it ought to be inerrant and without contradictions since God can surely not make any errors. Yet throughout the Bible and in almost every book, there are clear and identifiable errors, whether historical or scientific. There are numerous doublets and biblical contradictions that point to multiple authors writing according to the context and needs of their own times, and not writing perfect copies of God's word. None of the Bible was inspired by God.
How do copyist errors in the Bible not contradict nor violate the doctrine of Biblical inerrancy?
None of the few copyist errors in the Bible violate or confuse any Christian doctrine.
If the Bible is inerrant then why are there many historical and archaeological errors?
A:Yes, there are numerous historical and archaeological errors in the Bible. We therefore have to decide whether to continue to believe it is inerrant and, if so, what we mean by this. Some would say the Bible is inerrant on matters of faith, but not necessarily on history. Others would say if we find apparent errors in the Bile, then we have misunderstood the text, possibly for many centuries, and must reinterpret it. Of course, others would say that the Bible is the truly inerrant word of God and can not contain errors, and that if we read the Bible with total faith then those errors will just disappear.
What does it mean for the Christian's by' the Bible is inspired?
The Christian Church as a whole claims that the Bible is inspired and inerrant. This means that God is the one who moved through the writers to communicate to us the words which God wanted us to hear. This inspiration, however, is not a dictation, but a movement of God's spirit through the writer, utilizing the personality and style of the writer. Inerrancy means that all that is written in the inspired documents is without error. Now, there is a comment worth mentioning here. Inspiration and inerrancy applies to the original writings, not to the copies. In other words, it is the original writings that are without error. The copies, sadly, have copyist errors in them.
Is fool proof one word?
Yes, it is a single word foolproof (designed to work despite errors).
Why do you think God would allow a few copyist errors to creep into the Holy Bible?
None of the copyists errors that crept into the Holy Bible change God's message. Still, they let you know that while the Bible is true it is not perfect. God does not want you to worship the Bible. God wants you to worship him. If people thought the Bible was perfect, they might worship the Bible instead of worshipping God.
Can a trial balance usually has no mathematical errors if the total debit amounts equals total the credit amount?
no
What are the Errors that effect a trial balance?
Errors of Omission Errors of Commission Reversal of Entries Errors of Principle Errors of Original Entry Compensating Error these errors can be fount by a trial balance Wrong Casting Posting to the Wrong Side Posting Wrong Amounts Double Posting in a Single Account Errors of Totalling and Balancing of Accounts in the Ledger
Does the fact that the trial balanced mean that there are no errors in the account?
No. There could be missing entries or entries that were not correct (wrong amounts, duplicates, etc.)
What were Czar Nicholas II's worst errors?
Living extravagantly while his people were poor and suffering and not pulling out of World War I despite the high casualties.
Is the Holy Bible inerrant?
Some regard the Bible as inerrant - totally without error or contradiction. Others, more practically regard the Bible as infallible - containing possible errors or contradictions on matters of history and the natural world, but not on matters of faith. Calling the Bible inerrant means that the Bible contains no error of fact or transcription. This means that if any historical error or other error of fact is found in the Bible, then the entire belief in its inerrancy must be called into question. If the belief in the Bible's inerrancy is applied to an English translation of the Bible, this applies even to errors of translation. Some say that this rule for inerrancy is too broad and that the Bible contains exactly what God intends to convey, but the absence of error does not necessarily apply to the incidental, scientific, geographical, or historical statements in Scripture. Professor Alley of the University of Richmond is quoted as saying, "While some persons may continue to hold that the historic Christian belief in biblical infallibility and inerrancy is the only valid starting point and framework for a theology of revelation, such contentions should be heard with a smile and incorporated into the bylaws of the Flat Earth Society."
How much of the Bible was inspired by God?
For the Bible to be inspired by God, it ought to be inerrant and without contradictions since God can surely not make any errors. Yet throughout the Bible and in almost every book, there are clear and identifiable errors, whether historical or scientific. There are numerous doublets and biblical contradictions that point to multiple authors writing according to the context and needs of their own times, and not writing perfect copies of God's word. None of the Bible was inspired by God.
What impact did copyists errors have on the Scriptures?
Most copyist variants are mere matters of spelling and style and as such are easily discernible. When the text was altered by copyists, no essential teaching of the faith was compromised. The sheer volume of extant manuscripts is more than sufficient to retrieve the original message of the authors. While fundamentalists on the left, such as Bart Ehrman author of Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why, obsess over their many errors, textual critics render them trite, trivial, and easy to resolve.
