There is no rational route for this. For example we have Ohm's Law, but we only have Pythagoras' Theorem. Even though it may be proven and invariant.
And in economics we have the "Laws of Supply and Demand" even though hedged with all sorts of precautions, and economics is not really a science.
A scientific theory is an idea that is supported by a hypothesis. Once the theory is proven to be permanently correct, it is a law or fact.
A scientific law is the description of a recurring event that occurs in nature. A scientific theory is an explanation of the law. The law does not change, but the theory may change when new data indicate that it needs to.
Mostly semantics. A "law" is a theory that can be expressed mathematically.
No theories are correct. That is why they are called theories. These are the best that can be done with present knowledge, they explain and make prediction that could otherwise not be made. If those explanations are useful and the predictions turn out to be correct it strengthens the theory. It does not prove it. When a theory is proven to be true it is then called a law.
You're playing with words ... a "law" is just a thumb nail description of a theory.
Continuing research can turn up new or conflicting information regarding a theory or scientific law. It will then be changed even after general acceptance.
Differentiate or compare theory from law
command of sovereign sanctioned by punishments is law by imperative theory and law as legal science of norms is by pure theory of law.
A Theory is unproven, but Laws are proven. Theory becomes law after that theory is proven correct.
The theory come first because without a theory there is nothing to make a law.
A theory, when proven over time, can become a law. Example: Law of Gravity and Theory of Evolution
Pure Theory of Law was created in 1934.
"Law" is just a thumbnail version of a theory.
A law is known to be true. There is no dispute about it. A theory is disputable. Gravity is a law, the Big Bang is a theory.
A law is a description of a naturally occurring phenomenon, whereas a theory attempts to explain a law.
A law cannot become a theory, as laws are higher in scientific hierarchy than theories. Theories may become laws when the evidence for their factuality proves that the theory meets all established requirements set forth by the theory. If at any point in the scientific method a theory is disproven for the criteria that it sets forth, it can never be considered a Law. The hierarchy is thusly: Hypothesis < Theory < Law.
It was a law not the theory because this principle has also proved by him.