Differentiate or compare theory from law
A scientific theory is a well-substantiated explanation of a natural phenomenon that is supported by evidence and can be used to make predictions. It is a broad explanation that may encompass multiple related hypotheses. In contrast, a scientific law is a statement that describes a consistently observed behavior in nature but does not explain the underlying reasons for that behavior. Laws are usually more specific and narrow in scope compared to theories.
Legal theory refers to systematic frameworks used to analyze and understand the law, while jurisprudence is the philosophy and theory of law and the principles and methods used in legal reasoning. In other words, legal theory is more about analyzing and explaining the law, while jurisprudence is concerned with the nature of law itself.
The broken windows theory suggests that addressing minor signs of disorder, such as littering or vandalism, can prevent more serious crimes from occurring in a community. This theory has influenced policing strategies focused on community policing and proactive enforcement.
A Theory is unproven, but Laws are proven. Theory becomes law after that theory is proven correct.
Jurisprudence.
Both law and theory are based on principles and guidelines that explain phenomena or govern behavior. They are established frameworks that are continuously refined through observation, testing, and revisions. Both aim to provide understanding and predictability in their respective fields of study.
Civil Law
command of sovereign sanctioned by punishments is law by imperative theory and law as legal science of norms is by pure theory of law.
The theory come first because without a theory there is nothing to make a law.
A theory, when proven over time, can become a law. Example: Law of Gravity and Theory of Evolution
The charateristics that differentiate families from other social groups are law, education, lifestyle.
Pure Theory of Law was created in 1934.
A law is known to be true. There is no dispute about it. A theory is disputable. Gravity is a law, the Big Bang is a theory.
A law is a description of a naturally occurring phenomenon, whereas a theory attempts to explain a law.
A law cannot become a theory, as laws are higher in scientific hierarchy than theories. Theories may become laws when the evidence for their factuality proves that the theory meets all established requirements set forth by the theory. If at any point in the scientific method a theory is disproven for the criteria that it sets forth, it can never be considered a Law. The hierarchy is thusly: Hypothesis < Theory < Law.
It was a law not the theory because this principle has also proved by him.
A theory explains how something works - a "law" is just a thumb nail description of a theory.
A scientific theory is an idea that is supported by a hypothesis. Once the theory is proven to be permanently correct, it is a law or fact.