The difference between theory and natural law is that a theory is a framework, while a natural law is a single rule, usually expressed in mathematics. They are not two different stages of acceptance among scientists (as it is sometimes claimed in error); they are two completely different things; a theory does not evolve into a law with when sufficient evidence for a theory has been gathered for example.
For example consider:
The Theory of Special Relativity <-- Theory
Speed of light is constant <-- Law
Theory of Electromagnetism <-- Theory
Divergence of the Magnetic field is zero <-- Law
Quantum Field Theory <-- Theory
Conservation of Energy <-- Law
Scientific statements that unlike theories are indisputable facts are called laws. Examples are Isaac Newton's three laws of motion.
There is replicatable data that runs counter to the laws/theories.
No, scientific Laws and scientific theories are not same.Scientific Laws have proofs, they are acceptable by all like Newton's Laws of motion are accepted by allwhere as scientific theories demands proofs, these are not acceptable by all Like Theory by Charles Darwin is not acceptable by all
A model is an explanation of why an event occurs, and how data and events are related. So theories and hypothesis are testable statements and broad generalizations to compare data and to collect data.
In science, laws are concise statements that describe consistent and universal observations, often expressed mathematically, such as Newton's laws of motion. Theories, on the other hand, are comprehensive explanations of phenomena that are supported by extensive evidence and can encompass multiple laws; they provide a framework for understanding how and why things happen, like the theory of evolution. While laws predict what will happen under certain conditions, theories explain how and why those outcomes occur.
Laws have been proven, theories have not
all theories don't become laws
Scientific statements that unlike theories are indisputable facts are called laws. Examples are Isaac Newton's three laws of motion.
There is replicatable data that runs counter to the laws/theories.
Theories and laws serve different purposes in science. Theories are explanations that integrate and explain data from various observations, while laws are concise descriptions of a particular phenomenon. Theories are more comprehensive and can be modified or refined with new evidence, whereas laws are typically more general and do not change. Thus, theories are not elevated to laws but can support them.
the laws of motion
????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? hi brb fefeffeefefefefefeefefeefffffffffffffffffffffefefefe
In the scientific context, theories and laws serve different purposes. Theories are overarching explanations supported by a large body of evidence, while laws are concise statements describing natural phenomena. Theories do not "become" laws; they complement each other by providing explanations and descriptions in science.
Laws describe observed phenomena and relationships in nature, while theories explain why those phenomena occur based on tested hypotheses and evidence. Laws are more descriptive and specific, while theories are broader and provide a framework for understanding natural phenomena.
Scientific theories usually come before scientific laws. Theories are comprehensive explanations of a wide range of observations and data, while laws are concise statements describing specific relationships or patterns within a system. Theories often precede the formulation of laws as they help to understand and predict natural phenomena before they can be distilled into succinct laws.
all theories don't become laws
"Laws" are just simplified descriptions of theories.