Yes. You can write to the judge who is overseeing your case. You should have a very good reason for writing to him. If you are in jail and have not seen a lawyer, that is a good reason. If your lawyer refuses to listen to you or talk to you about your up coming trial, that is a good reason. If you are in a cell where you are being assaulted, that is a good reason. After you have been convicted, you may have just one more chance to write to your judge. You should be sure your letter has every possible thing you want him to know.
Yes. Before the trial/hearing starts the defendant can choose to be tried by a jury or the judge.
Not really enough information given in order to answer. Sign an order for what? Affecting who? Who 'dismissed' the judge from the case? If you think the judge issued an improper order AFTER she no longer had jurisdiction over the case, take the order to the judge presently presiding over the case and ask him to "stay" the other judge's order.
After the case is over and the judge has discharged the jury.
It is unethical and illegal for a judge to kill a case. Judges are expected to preside over cases impartially and fairly, and any attempt to manipulate the outcome of a case is a violation of judicial ethics and can lead to severe consequences, including removal from the bench. If there are concerns about a judge's behavior in a case, it should be addressed through appropriate legal channels.
I am not sure I understand your question. Do you mean what do you write when you file for the court? If so write the problem clearly and what happened. DO NOT LIE or EMBELLISH. If the judge catches you in a lie your case is over. Bring all the documents, letters, pictures, estimates, and any thing else to help you win the case.
He SHOULD not. Ethics (and possibly state law) would prevent him from hearing your case.
Case disposed means that a case has been dismissed, withdrawn or resolved. The judge that presides over the case has the power to dismiss or resolve the case.
Sebe Dale, Jr. (current chancellor) is the son of Sebe Dale, Sr., who was the circuit judge who presided over the Mack Charles Parker case. This page: http://www.msstate.edu/org/prelaw/DJ/2000/index.html states that as of the year 2000, Sebe Dale Jr. had been a chancery judge for over 20 years. The Mack Charles Parker case was in 1959 and was a circuit court case. Sebe Dale Jr. is probably the son of the judge who presided over the '59 case. If Sebe Dale Jr. had been a judge in 1959, he would have been a judge for over 40 years when he was given the award that is referenced in the article above. The article says that Sebe Dale Jr. had been a judge for over 20 years, not 40.
It is generally frowned upon for a judge to preside over a case involving a family member due to the potential conflict of interest. If such a situation were to arise, the judge would likely need to recuse themselves from the case and have another judge handle it.
No, same prostutor and most of the time, same judge. However your area maybe different.
Everything depends on the unique circumstances of your case - only the judge presiding over your case can answer that question.
If a judge dies during a trial, a new judge would typically be assigned to the case to ensure continuity and proceed with the trial. The new judge would review the case documents and proceedings before making any decisions or rulings.
He will usually NOT dismiss the litigants case, (UNLESS he comes to the conclusion that it is a frivolous one) but the judge WILL appoint a counsel to either take over the case, or "assist" the pro se individual.