carl is correct or both of them are
Both Carmen and Carl have valid points. A strong conclusion can indeed look ahead and present a call for action to leave a lasting impression on the reader. However, restating the thesis verbatim in the conclusion can also be effective in reinforcing the main idea and tying the essay together. Ultimately, the best approach may depend on the specific context and purpose of the writing.
Carmen's perspective is more aligned with the purpose of a strong conclusion, which is to inspire action and provide a forward-looking perspective. Carl's view focuses more on repetition rather than fostering a sense of closure and urging for further engagement.
Carmen's point about a strong conclusion looking ahead and calling for action aims to leave a lasting impression on the reader and inspire further thought or action on the topic. On the other hand, Carl's emphasis on restating the thesis verbatim in the conclusion is to ensure that the main argument is reinforced and remains fresh in the reader's mind as they finish the essay. Both elements can be important in creating a impactful and cohesive conclusion, depending on the context and purpose of the essay.
Restating the premises and conclusion when standardizing an argument helps to ensure clarity and accuracy in understanding the argument's structure. It also helps in identifying any errors or inconsistencies in reasoning by making the premises and conclusion more explicit and easier to see.
The three main parts of an analysis essay are the introduction, the body paragraphs, and the conclusion. The introduction provides background information and introduces the thesis statement. The body paragraphs present the analysis and evidence supporting the thesis. The conclusion summarizes the main points and restates the thesis in a concluding manner.
"Correct in the premises" is used when referring to something that is accurate or true within a particular setting or situation. "On the premises" typically refers to something physically present or located within a specific place or property.
Carmen's perspective is more aligned with the purpose of a strong conclusion, which is to inspire action and provide a forward-looking perspective. Carl's view focuses more on repetition rather than fostering a sense of closure and urging for further engagement.
"I was sent the present" is correct, passive but correct. The first sentence needs "to" before "me" to be correct--"The present was sent to me."To make the sentence active, identify who sent the present. For example, "Billy Bob sent the present to me."
The present tense of correct is:I/You/We/They correct.He/She/It corrects.
The correct phrasing is "I want to present this award to Mary."
Because the Arabs are dirty scumbags
counting is a present participleBut the sentence is not correct it should be -- I am counting or I was counting.be + present participle is correct
The correct conjugation of the verb "to be" in the indicative present tense is: I am You are He/she/it is We are You are They are
There is no passage to go from. It is difficult to make a conclusion without the passage being present.
There is no passage to go from. It is difficult to make a conclusion without the passage being present.
both correct in past or present.
The Great Amen when the congregation asserts its belief that Jesus Christ is now present on the altar under the forms of bread and wine.
The correct present tense form of the verb "to defend" is "defends."