answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

carl is correct or both of them are

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

AnswerBot

3d ago

Both Carmen and Carl have valid points. A strong conclusion can indeed look ahead and present a call for action to leave a lasting impression on the reader. However, restating the thesis verbatim in the conclusion can also be effective in reinforcing the main idea and tying the essay together. Ultimately, the best approach may depend on the specific context and purpose of the writing.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Carmen asserts that a strong conclusion should look ahead and present a call for action.Carl agrees except he insist that a strong conclusion should restate the thesis vebatim. Who is correct.?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Philosophy

Carmen asserts that a strong conclusion to as essay should look ahead and present a call for action carl agrees except he insists that a strong conclusion should restate the thesis verbatim who is?

Carmen's perspective is more aligned with the purpose of a strong conclusion, which is to inspire action and provide a forward-looking perspective. Carl's view focuses more on repetition rather than fostering a sense of closure and urging for further engagement.


When Carmen asserts that a strong conclusion to an essay should look ahead and present a call for action. Carl agrees except he also insist that a strong conclusion should restate the thesis verbatim.?

Carmen's point about a strong conclusion looking ahead and calling for action aims to leave a lasting impression on the reader and inspire further thought or action on the topic. On the other hand, Carl's emphasis on restating the thesis verbatim in the conclusion is to ensure that the main argument is reinforced and remains fresh in the reader's mind as they finish the essay. Both elements can be important in creating a impactful and cohesive conclusion, depending on the context and purpose of the essay.


When you are standardizing an argument why do you re-state the premises and conclusion?

Restating the premises and conclusion when standardizing an argument helps to ensure clarity and accuracy in understanding the argument's structure. It also helps in identifying any errors or inconsistencies in reasoning by making the premises and conclusion more explicit and easier to see.


What are the three main parts of analysis essay?

The three main parts of an analysis essay are the introduction, the body paragraphs, and the conclusion. The introduction provides background information and introduces the thesis statement. The body paragraphs present the analysis and evidence supporting the thesis. The conclusion summarizes the main points and restates the thesis in a concluding manner.


What is correct in the premises or on the premises?

"Correct in the premises" is used when referring to something that is accurate or true within a particular setting or situation. "On the premises" typically refers to something physically present or located within a specific place or property.

Related questions

Carmen asserts that a strong conclusion to as essay should look ahead and present a call for action carl agrees except he insists that a strong conclusion should restate the thesis verbatim who is?

Carmen's perspective is more aligned with the purpose of a strong conclusion, which is to inspire action and provide a forward-looking perspective. Carl's view focuses more on repetition rather than fostering a sense of closure and urging for further engagement.


Is it right sentence - The present was sent me. or I was sent the present.?

"I was sent the present" is correct, passive but correct. The first sentence needs "to" before "me" to be correct--"The present was sent to me."To make the sentence active, identify who sent the present. For example, "Billy Bob sent the present to me."


What is present tense of correct?

The present tense of correct is:I/You/We/They correct.He/She/It corrects.


Is want to present this award to Mary correct?

The correct phrasing is "I want to present this award to Mary."


What are the Historical claims which Israel asserts from ancient times to the present which solidify the truth of its ownership and governorship of the land?

Because the Arabs are dirty scumbags


I counting the drawer. What is the present participle of the verb?

counting is a present participleBut the sentence is not correct it should be -- I am counting or I was counting.be + present participle is correct


What is the correct conjugation of the verb to be on its indicative present tense?

The correct conjugation of the verb "to be" in the indicative present tense is: I am You are He/she/it is We are You are They are


Which is the most valid conclusion regarding theme of the passage?

There is no passage to go from. It is difficult to make a conclusion without the passage being present.


Which is the most valid conclusion regarding the theme of the passage?

There is no passage to go from. It is difficult to make a conclusion without the passage being present.


Which is correct you do this before or you did this before?

both correct in past or present.


What is the most important response of the Mass?

The Great Amen when the congregation asserts its belief that Jesus Christ is now present on the altar under the forms of bread and wine.


The correct present tense form of the verb to defend?

The correct present tense form of the verb "to defend" is "defends."