both carmen and carl are correct
Carmen's perspective is more aligned with the purpose of a strong conclusion, which is to inspire action and provide a forward-looking perspective. Carl's view focuses more on repetition rather than fostering a sense of closure and urging for further engagement.
Carmen's point about a strong conclusion looking ahead and calling for action aims to leave a lasting impression on the reader and inspire further thought or action on the topic. On the other hand, Carl's emphasis on restating the thesis verbatim in the conclusion is to ensure that the main argument is reinforced and remains fresh in the reader's mind as they finish the essay. Both elements can be important in creating a impactful and cohesive conclusion, depending on the context and purpose of the essay.
Both Carmen and Carl have valid points. A strong conclusion can indeed look ahead and present a call for action to leave a lasting impression on the reader. However, restating the thesis verbatim in the conclusion can also be effective in reinforcing the main idea and tying the essay together. Ultimately, the best approach may depend on the specific context and purpose of the writing.
Restating the premises and conclusion when standardizing an argument helps to ensure clarity and accuracy in understanding the argument's structure. It also helps in identifying any errors or inconsistencies in reasoning by making the premises and conclusion more explicit and easier to see.
The three main parts of an analysis essay are the introduction, the body paragraphs, and the conclusion. The introduction provides background information and introduces the thesis statement. The body paragraphs present the analysis and evidence supporting the thesis. The conclusion summarizes the main points and restates the thesis in a concluding manner.
A persuasive essay typically has five paragraphs. These include an introduction, three body paragraphs that present arguments and evidence, and a conclusion.
Both Carmen and Carl have valid points. A strong conclusion can indeed look ahead and present a call for action to leave a lasting impression on the reader. However, restating the thesis verbatim in the conclusion can also be effective in reinforcing the main idea and tying the essay together. Ultimately, the best approach may depend on the specific context and purpose of the writing.
Because the Arabs are dirty scumbags
There is no passage to go from. It is difficult to make a conclusion without the passage being present.
There is no passage to go from. It is difficult to make a conclusion without the passage being present.
The Great Amen when the congregation asserts its belief that Jesus Christ is now present on the altar under the forms of bread and wine.
When you are making and observation.
They're asking for a witness to be present. It can happen if the doctor is concerned the patient may try to say the doctor behaved inappropriately.
Restating the premises and conclusion when standardizing an argument helps to ensure clarity and accuracy in understanding the argument's structure. It also helps in identifying any errors or inconsistencies in reasoning by making the premises and conclusion more explicit and easier to see.
That depends on what you said about it earlier, in the main body of the paper. The conclusion should summarize and tie together everything you worked so hard to present between the introduction and the conclusion. If the introduction said what was about to come, and then it came, then the conclusion can just point out again what has just come.
The present tense of "finally" is "finally." This word remains the same in present tense as it is an adverb indicating the conclusion of something or when something is done after a long time.
The organizational pattern
When you are making and observation.