answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

both carmen and carl are correct

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

AnswerBot

3d ago

Carmen's perspective is more aligned with the purpose of a strong conclusion, which is to inspire action and provide a forward-looking perspective. Carl's view focuses more on repetition rather than fostering a sense of closure and urging for further engagement.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Carmen asserts that a strong conclusion to as essay should look ahead and present a call for action carl agrees except he insists that a strong conclusion should restate the thesis verbatim who is?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Philosophy

When Carmen asserts that a strong conclusion to an essay should look ahead and present a call for action. Carl agrees except he also insist that a strong conclusion should restate the thesis verbatim.?

Carmen's point about a strong conclusion looking ahead and calling for action aims to leave a lasting impression on the reader and inspire further thought or action on the topic. On the other hand, Carl's emphasis on restating the thesis verbatim in the conclusion is to ensure that the main argument is reinforced and remains fresh in the reader's mind as they finish the essay. Both elements can be important in creating a impactful and cohesive conclusion, depending on the context and purpose of the essay.


Carmen asserts that a strong conclusion should look ahead and present a call for action.Carl agrees except he insist that a strong conclusion should restate the thesis vebatim. Who is correct.?

Both Carmen and Carl have valid points. A strong conclusion can indeed look ahead and present a call for action to leave a lasting impression on the reader. However, restating the thesis verbatim in the conclusion can also be effective in reinforcing the main idea and tying the essay together. Ultimately, the best approach may depend on the specific context and purpose of the writing.


When you are standardizing an argument why do you re-state the premises and conclusion?

Restating the premises and conclusion when standardizing an argument helps to ensure clarity and accuracy in understanding the argument's structure. It also helps in identifying any errors or inconsistencies in reasoning by making the premises and conclusion more explicit and easier to see.


What are the three main parts of analysis essay?

The three main parts of an analysis essay are the introduction, the body paragraphs, and the conclusion. The introduction provides background information and introduces the thesis statement. The body paragraphs present the analysis and evidence supporting the thesis. The conclusion summarizes the main points and restates the thesis in a concluding manner.


How many paragraphs does a persuasive essay have?

A persuasive essay typically has five paragraphs. These include an introduction, three body paragraphs that present arguments and evidence, and a conclusion.

Related questions

Carmen asserts that a strong conclusion should look ahead and present a call for action.Carl agrees except he insist that a strong conclusion should restate the thesis vebatim. Who is correct.?

Both Carmen and Carl have valid points. A strong conclusion can indeed look ahead and present a call for action to leave a lasting impression on the reader. However, restating the thesis verbatim in the conclusion can also be effective in reinforcing the main idea and tying the essay together. Ultimately, the best approach may depend on the specific context and purpose of the writing.


What are the Historical claims which Israel asserts from ancient times to the present which solidify the truth of its ownership and governorship of the land?

Because the Arabs are dirty scumbags


Which is the most valid conclusion regarding theme of the passage?

There is no passage to go from. It is difficult to make a conclusion without the passage being present.


Which is the most valid conclusion regarding the theme of the passage?

There is no passage to go from. It is difficult to make a conclusion without the passage being present.


What is the most important response of the Mass?

The Great Amen when the congregation asserts its belief that Jesus Christ is now present on the altar under the forms of bread and wine.


In autobiographical writing when would you include a bridge to present in your conclusion?

When you are making and observation.


What is it called when a doctor insists that a medical assistant be present in the room when a patient is being examined?

They're asking for a witness to be present. It can happen if the doctor is concerned the patient may try to say the doctor behaved inappropriately.


When you are standardizing an argument why do you re-state the premises and conclusion?

Restating the premises and conclusion when standardizing an argument helps to ensure clarity and accuracy in understanding the argument's structure. It also helps in identifying any errors or inconsistencies in reasoning by making the premises and conclusion more explicit and easier to see.


How can you write a conclusion for the topic light?

That depends on what you said about it earlier, in the main body of the paper. The conclusion should summarize and tie together everything you worked so hard to present between the introduction and the conclusion. If the introduction said what was about to come, and then it came, then the conclusion can just point out again what has just come.


What is the present tense of finally?

The present tense of "finally" is "finally." This word remains the same in present tense as it is an adverb indicating the conclusion of something or when something is done after a long time.


Which of these best describe the text structure ofan essay?

The organizational pattern


N autobiographical writing when would you include a bridge to the present in your conclusion?

When you are making and observation.