answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

In 1966 Ernesto Miranda sued the state of Arizona because he was not aware of his rights when he confessed to a crime. Now the Miranda rights are always read. If you are not read your rights you probably cannot sue, but the police cannot use anything you have said against you in a court of law.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

AnswerBot

6mo ago

Civil suits for not being read Miranda rights are generally not successful because the failure to read Miranda rights does not invalidate a conviction or provide a separate cause of action in civil court. Miranda rights are a procedural safeguard to protect a suspect's Fifth Amendment rights against self-incrimination during custodial interrogations. If a person's Miranda rights are not read, any statements they make may be excluded from being used in a criminal trial, but it does not entitle them to file a civil suit.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Civil suits for not being read Miranda rights?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Where did you get draft of civil suit?

i want sample of the civil suits


What type of punishments can be awarded in civil suits?

money.


Do civil suits seek punishment or compensation?

compensation


What did the nurses where back then in the civil war?

doctor suits


How do suits of equity differ from other civil lawsuits?

No


Civil suits pending in Tamil Nadu courts?

yes


What is most likely involved in a civil lawsuit?

In a civil lawsuit, one party (the plaintiff) alleges that the other party (the defendant) caused harm or injury and seeks compensation or a specific remedy from the court. This may involve presenting evidence, witness testimonies, legal arguments, and possibly reaching a settlement through negotiation or mediation. The court will then decide the outcome based on the evidence and applicable laws.


Which president signed the Civil Rights Bill of 1964?

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 is an act to enforce the constitutional right to vote, to confer jurisdiction upon the district courts of the United States of America to provide injunctive relief against discrimination in public accommodations, to authorize the Attorney General to institute suits to protect constitutional rights in public facilities and public education, to extend the Commission on Civil Rights, to prevent discrimination in federally assisted programs, to establish a Commission on Equal Employment Opportunity, and for other purposes. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was enacted by the 88th United States Congress, becoming effective on July 2, 1964 following being signed into law by Lyndon B. Johnson, the 36th President of the United States.


Which type of law suits tend to have a conclusion that involves monetary government?

Civil


What type of law suits tend to have a conclusion that involves monetary settlement?

Civil


Which type of law suits tend to have a conclusion that involves monetary settlement?

Civil


Is DUI a civil matter?

No, it is a criminal matter. Civil suits are for disputes between two private parties, like contracts or property damage.