Speaking in general terms, the clashing of two moral values is accurately described as a "moral dilemma." Such clashes may occur in an individual's life or thought, in an institution, or even for a society as a whole.
Right versus Right dilemma
absolute moral values and behavioral or cultural values
The adjective form for the verb to clash is the present particple clashing; for example, clashing personalities or clashing dishes.
From my vantage point on the hill, I watched the two armies clashing.
There is a direct relationship between virtue values and moral concepts in the business place. The virtue values and the rules that we live by and moral concepts are the principles used to judge others. The two ideologies have to work hand in hand.
Level three: "post-conventional reasoning" is when morals are internalized. "Conventional reasoning" (level two) involves intermediate internalization.
W. D. Ross claimed that there are two worlds: the world of facts, which can be measured and observed, and the world of values, which includes moral and ethical principles. He argued that these two worlds are related but distinct, with moral obligations existing independently from factual truths.
Their moral values. God has nothing to do with love between two people, and you shouldn't let it come between two people in a healthy realtionship.
By two tectonic plates clashing against each other, forcing them either up or down
What is the difference between "morals" and "morality"? I think these are just two sides of the same moral phenomenon. Morals are the social side and morality is the individual side of the same. Morals mean for me the moral norms and moral principles of the common sense and/or accepted by the members of a social community. Morality means the personal moral values and principles which conduct really my behaviour.
In Steins theory of community, Stein compares the individual and community experience and dicerns two types. The individual experience of which the 'I' is the subject is subjective, and the community experience of which the community is the subject is inter-subjective. The first constitutes the second and the second is experienced through subjective experience. An analogy would be 'a river in which I am a unit of water.' When we share the values of another we become 'plugged in' sharing and feeding off of each others energy. A community is were 'we' share the same values and gain life-power. Life power comes from the members, outsiders and the motivation (values). We do not have to have the same values to plug into one another. People can be infected with energy without conforming to the same beliefs. It is harder to swim against the stream taking a moral stance. Taking a moral stance take up a lot of energy. Although if you only allow youself to be access the values of others you are but being carried by communal energy losing your individualism.
faith and dignity, rule as the most important moral values in our life. the relationship between this two is the connection that completes every mans Christianity.