0
The constitution for the confederate states was of course what the u.s didn't allow them to have such as slavery, In doing so they let the Americans progress in technology leaving them in an era of time. Now the u.s constitution had limits where as to the confederates were doing as they please.
What else can I help you with?
Compare and contrast the US Constitution to Ireland's constitution?
um i dont know?
Compare and contrast the preamble of the 1935 constitution with that of the 1987 constitution?
they are just differnt
Comparison of 1973 constitution with 1956 and 1962?
1:Objected Resolution.
Who was not the pseudonym of a writer who opposed the constitution?
One notable figure who did not use a pseudonym to oppose the Constitution was George Mason. He was a prominent statesman and a delegate to the Constitutional Convention who ultimately refused to sign the Constitution due to his concerns over the lack of a Bill of Rights. In contrast, writers like "Brutus" and "Cato" used pseudonyms to express their opposition to the Constitution during the ratification debates.
Which is not an example of an informal amendment to the us constitution?
An example of an informal amendment to the U.S. Constitution would be a change in societal norms or judicial interpretation that affects how the Constitution is applied, such as landmark Supreme Court decisions. In contrast, a formal amendment, like the addition of the Bill of Rights or any other change to the text of the Constitution, is not considered informal. Therefore, a formal amendment process, outlined in Article V of the Constitution, is not an example of an informal amendment.
How do you explain Delegated Power?
Delegated power is power specifically outlined in the Constitution. These are in contrast to implied powers which are not outlined.
Would the Roman constitution be easier or more difficult to change than the US constitution?
The Roman constitution, characterized by a series of unwritten customs and traditions, allowed for more fluidity and adaptation over time, making it generally easier to change through political consensus and practice. In contrast, the U.S. Constitution has a formal amendment process that requires supermajority approval in Congress and ratification by the states, making it more challenging to amend. Therefore, while both systems have their complexities, the Roman constitution was typically more adaptable than the U.S. Constitution.
How can you Compare and contrast the US Constitution and state constitutions?
They both have the right to make bills
In what way is the Constitution more flexible than the Articles of Confederation?
Amendments to the Articles of Confederation required an absolute unanimous approval. In contrast, the Constitution only required a three quarters approval, thus allowing lenience in the approval of amendments.
Of the following which requires a change to the written words of the Constitution?
To determine which option requires a change to the written words of the Constitution, you would typically look for proposals such as amendments that alter existing provisions or introduce new concepts. For example, changing the voting age would necessitate an amendment, as it directly modifies the Constitution's text. In contrast, actions like judicial interpretations or legislative practices do not require altering the Constitution's wording.
What is an anitfederalist?
The Anti-Federalists felt that the Constitution of 1788 granted too much power to the federal government at the expense of state power and desired a return to the Articles of Confederation, ratified in 1781. In contrast, the Federalists believed that the Articles of Confederation did not grant enough power to the federal government, and they are the ones directly responsible for the Constitution of 1788.
Difference between the US Constitution and the Great Britain Constitution?
See links for interesting articles. The UK Constitution is not codified as is the US Constitution, but the basic concept is that of Parliamentary Supremacy. In other words, Constitutional law exists as a result of, and is therefore changed by, acts of Parliament. The US Constitution, in contrast, is codified. There are advantages to both systems. The UK system is more fluid, and it takes an immense effort for the US Constitution to be amended. On the other hand, the US Constitution gives direction and parameters to the branches of government, while also establishing the rights and powers of the states, and a mechanism to bring about the most far-reaching changes with as little disruption as possible.
