Young Earth creationism asserts that the earth and universe were created by God in a literal six days about 6,000-10,000 years ago, as described in The Bible, whereas Old Earth creationism accommodates scientific dating methods and allows for a much older age of the earth and universe, but still believes in a divine creator. Both views seek to reconcile scientific and religious beliefs, but differ in their interpretations of the age of the earth and universe.
The antonym for old is young.
The opposite of old is young.
Old or aging.Old or Elder
The antonym of "old" is "young."
"An old head on young shoulders" refers to a person who is young but displays wisdom, maturity, or experience beyond their years. It suggests that the individual possesses qualities or insights typically associated with someone older or more experienced.
The Old Stone Age, or Paleolithic period, was characterized by hunting and gathering as the main way of obtaining food, while the New Stone Age, or Neolithic period, saw the development of agriculture and animal domestication. The Old Stone Age featured simple tools and weapons made of stone, while the New Stone Age saw the advancement of stone tools, pottery, and more complex societies. The transition from the Old Stone Age to the New Stone Age marked a significant shift in human lifestyle and marked the beginning of settled communities.
1) In order to reconcile Creation with Evolution, Old-Earth Creationism holds that God made the universe and then guided Evolution over long epochs.2) In repudiation of Evolution, Young-Earth Creationismholds that God created the universe and living things relatively recently without the use of Evolution.See also the Related Links.Link: Evidence for CreationLink: Can you show that God existsLink: God's wisdom seen in His creations
To compare and contract new and old slavery, you would need to do research on both to find out information about them. You would then need to choose a couple or more ways they are alike and a couple or more ways they are different in order to compare and contrast them.
ones hella old
Young man--old man Single-seat Mercury capsule--part of a shuttle crew Orbiting Earth was new--Orbiting is old hat Returned and landed in water--Returned and landed on land
do it old school and look it up in a science book or somethin'
Young man--old man Single-seat Mercury capsule--part of a shuttle crew Orbiting Earth was new--Orbiting is old hat Returned and landed in water--Returned and landed on land
Creationism is the belief that the earth and living things derive from explicit acts of Divine Creation. For young-Earth creationists, this comprises a literal understanding of the Book of Genesis and the disbelief in Evolution. Here are some websites for creationism including young-earth, old-earth, and intelligent design creationism. Answers in Genesis: Young-earth creationist department, which operates a Creation Museum. Access Research Network: Advocates of Intellectual Design Creationism. Center for Science and Culture: Intelligent design belief. Part of the Seattle-based Discovery Institute. Creation Ministries International: Young-earth creationists. Creation Research Society: Research arm of the creation Institute. Institute for Creation Research: A central group of young-earth creationism.
There are at least two, quite different forms of creationism, and the question of whether creationism is credible must be applied separately to each. No doubt, both Young-Earth creationism and Old-Earth creationism are credible to their proponents, but the question must be whether they are credible to other well informed people.Young-Earth creationism holds that the Earth is only a few thousand years old, usually around six thousand. However, science has proven conclusively that the world is billions of years old, so this can not be credible. Because of the overwhelming evidence that the world is certainly more than six thousand years old, some Young-Earth creationists have adapted Young-Earth creationism by saying that each of the days stated in Genesis chapter 1 was really an almost indefinite period of time. According to this version, the world could be many thousands of years old. This not only undermines the standard Young-Earth creationism argument, but it is even less credible, given that there is no supporting evidence for this, not even biblical evidence.Old-Earth creationism accepts the scientific evidence for the great age of the Earth, so from this point of view it is more credible than Young-Earth creationism. Nevertheless, some Old-Earth creationists say that God created all living things just as they are today. Others accept that species evolved, but say that this was not the result of natural selection but Intelligent Design. Both versions of Old-Earth creationism fail in the face of scientific evidence, although Intelligent Design is more sophisticated and therefore somewhat more credible. Intelligent Design is also claimed by some Young-Earth creationists, perhaps because it has captured the imagination of a proportion of the population, but it seems inherently an Old-Earth creationism concept.Ultimately credibility comes down to whether a hypothesis is compatible with the scientific evidence. Creationists do not put forward scientific evidence to support their hypotheses, instead proposing various ways in which they believe they can undermine the evidence for evolution. Occasionally, scientists respond (eg. Dawkins, Perakh, et al)and demonstrate the failure of these arguments. So, to be credible, creationism has to adapt further, until its claims are at least somewhat consistent with the scientific evidence.For more information, please visit: http://christianity.answers.com/theology/the-story-of-creation
look at your class notes
OEC is an umbrella term for various ideas on the Creation. These include the Gap Theory and Progressive Creationism. Suggest you look it up via the phrase 'old earth creationism' as it it too long to summarize here.
According to creationism, the Earth is less than 10,000 years old, and is usually found to be around 6,000 years old. This results from an interpretation of Biblical genealogies.