0
Compare the policies and methods used by Otto von Bismarck and sardar vallab bhai patel in unification of Germany and integration of states of India respectively?
Wiki User
∙ 16y ago
Otto Von Bismarck used a combination of war and diplomacy to unify the German states under Prussian leadership, culminating in the Franco-Prussian War and the formation of the German Empire in 1871. Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel employed a strategy of persuasion, negotiation, and coercion to convince the princely states of India to join the Indian Union after independence in 1947, known as the "iron fist in a velvet glove" approach. Both leaders were instrumental in the consolidation of diverse regions into single political entities through different means.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What are some differences between otto von Bismarck and the emperor meiji?
Otto von Bismarck was the Chancellor of Prussia and played a key role in the unification of Germany in the 19th century through his Realpolitik policies. Emperor Meiji, on the other hand, was the Emperor of Japan during the Meiji era, overseeing the modernization and westernization of Japan in the late 19th to early 20th centuries. Bismarck focused on unifying Germany through political maneuvering, while Emperor Meiji focused on modernizing Japan to adapt to the changing global landscape.
What are the similarities and dissimilarities between the methods and policies adopted by otto von Bismarck and sardar vallabh bhai patel?
Both Otto von Bismarck and Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel played crucial roles in unifying their respective countries through statecraft and diplomacy. Both leaders utilized diplomacy, strategic alliances, and military force to unite their fragmented nations. However, Bismarck's methods were more focused on using warfare and power politics to achieve unification, while Patel's approach emphasized negotiation and non-violent resistance to integrate princely states into India.
Why is Bismarck a conservative?
Bismarck is often considered conservative because of his promotion of traditional social hierarchies and his emphasis on maintaining stability and order in society. He implemented policies that supported the monarchy, elite interests, and state control over key sectors of society, all hallmarks of conservative ideology during his time.
What did Otto Von Bismarck mean in the welfare state?
Otto Von Bismarck, known for implementing social welfare programs in Germany during the late 19th century, aimed to address social unrest and undermine support for the socialist movement. His policies, including workers' compensation and health insurance, were designed to protect workers and secure their loyalty to the government. Bismarck believed that these welfare measures could maintain social stability and strengthen the German state.
Compare the policies and method used by Otto von Bismarck and Sardar Vallabhai Patel?
Answer in the
How did William I and William II view Bismarck?
William I hired Bismarck because of his beliefs and the two men had the same ideas in mind for the unification and growth of the country. William II saw Bismarck as an old relict of William I's time, although he did continue many of Bismarck's policies.
What was the policies did Otto Von Bismarck's follow to meet meet his goal?
realpolitik
How was Otto von Bismarck important in World War 1?
He wasn't all that important- he died long before the war started. He was important in the unification of Germany, however.Interestingly, his foreign policies were instrumental in preventing a major war on the level of World War I. Kaiser Wilhelm, who disliked the old Iron Chancellor, fired Bismarck and began undoing Bismarck's policies. This led to the alliance of Britain, France, and Russia, which Bismarck had tried so hard to prevent, and would be instrumental in the outbreak of the war.
What was Otto Bismarck policies of realpolitik and Iron Blood?
The phrase referred to his policy of uniting Germany by force, under the leadership of Prussia. Bismarck (1815-1898) was prime minister of Prussia and was a major force behind the unification of Germany in 1871. ___________ Not just force. "Blood" in this context isn't blood shed in war, it's common German nationality, give or take Austria. His approach involved a lot of politics too. But the final decision came down to war (the clash of "iron").
What was chancellor otto van Bismarck's main goal?
Bismarck was a Chancellor of the new German Empire in 1871. Germanizing is a domestic policy that directing all non-German people who are citizens of Germany should be converted into German and Kulturkampf or anti-Papacy were the policies he made.
Role of youth in national integration?
Children play an important role in national integration. They are the backbone of their country and have the power to enhance it or destroy it.
Liberalisation privatization globalisation?
Liberalisation is to relax regulations on social or economic policies (usually economic). Privatisation is the process of transferring a public sector industry over to the private sector. Globalisation is the unification of the global markets by relaxing protectionist trade policies and integrating markets.
Why did William 2 dismiss Bismarck as chancellor what policies did William introduce?
william 2 dismissed bismark as chancellor because he believed in divine right and there should be only one ruler.
When and why was Bismarck removed from his position as Chancellor of Germany?
Bismarck was removed from his position as Chancellor of Germany in 1890. This happened because Emperor Wilhelm II wanted to pursue a more aggressive foreign policy and saw Bismarck as an obstacle. Additionally, Bismarck's popularity waned due to a series of failed policies and conflicts with other political factions.
Which leader is responsible for uniting the German states together into one country?
Generally speaking this credit should belong to Otto Von Bismarck. His policies led to a unified Germany with him as chancellor under King Wilhelm I. Bismarck held back the forces of socialism in his day by giving workers benefits other nations took years to establish.
What wa the purpose of such harsh Nazi policies on the Jews?
Unification in having a common enemy or scapegoat.Hitler was an expert in mass hysteria. They would kill someone who was a threat & then blame someone else & use them as a martyr.
Give at least two reasons why Bismarck was an effective leader?
Domestically, Bismarck was always sly and able to subvert the plans of his opponents. Take the ardent disdain he had for socialism; Bismark implemented various Left (even by today's standards) policies to undermine the strength of socialism. In his efforts to make a unified Germany, he had to play German states off of Austria
