Answer 1
It would be nice, wouldn't it? Hasn't happened in a thousand years, though. Let's overthrow our bloodthirsty leaders!
Answer 2
Yes, of course.
All God religions call for peace and non discrimination. Islam religion doesn't call for terrorism or violence. Muslims call Christians and Jews 'people of the book' because Muslims believe in their holy books The Bible and the Torah and they believe in all God prophets including Jesus and Moses (peace be upon them).
Accordingly, any political or social or economical differences could; and should; be resolved peacefully. Any faith differences are matters of faith between one and his/her God and should not be points of differences between Muslims and Christians.
Answer 3
The issue is not theology at this point in history; but political. Christians and Muslims are coming into conflict in places where political influence comes at the barrel of a gun. If you can resolve the politics, the communities will be at peace.
It could be Lebanon.
Hindus and Muslims in the colony of India could not resolve their religious differences.
The Christians were ultimately defeated by the Muslims in the 3rd Crusade in 1192. Saladin and King Richard I signed a treaty which lasted for 5 years. The treaty states that Christians were allowed to visit the Holy Sepulcher, Christians could claim coastal cities as far south as Jaffa and Christians and Muslims could move freely in each other's territory.
A synonym for peacefully could be serenely or calmly.
The French don't believe in a certain God, it depends on the person, you could have Christians, Muslims, Hindus; pretty much anything.
All the soldiers that fought in the Crusades were Crusaders, and you could identify them by the red cross on their white cloth over their armor. Christians and Muslims:)
Allah and Yahweh are two names for the same deity that is worshiped by Jews, Christians, and Muslims alike. According to Christians, Jesus is the son of this God and, in a sense, and earthly manifestation of Him. According to Muslims, Jesus is not the son of God, but is still a very important prophet, and so could be regarded as a friend of God.
There are many cities that could qualify under this header. The one you are probably looking for is Jerusalem, but Granada (as well as most other Spanish cities), Acre (as well as most other cities in Lebanon, Israel, and Palestine), all the way up to Lašva Valley (as well as other cities in the numerous Jugoslav ethnic cleansing massacres against Muslims), and numerous other examples. This is not to say that it never went the other way, but Muslims were generally more willing to live with subservient Christians than Christians were willing to live with subservient Muslims.
The Christians and Muslims had different historical traditions as to how Jerusalem should be ruled and controlled. The Christian view was exclusivist. Under their view, only Christians should be permitted to live or visit the cities. Jews and Muslims were equally forbidden from living in or visiting the city. Conversely, the Muslims had a policy of unequal tolerance. This meant that while Christians and Jews could not have the same status as Muslims in regards to politics and privileges, Christians and Jews could live and work in Jerusalem as well as pray at their holy sites. This toleration also led to the preservation of these holy sites, as opposed to their demolition or disregard, which was common under Christendom for non-Christian centers of worship.Saladin, the Muslim leader who enforced this policy of religious toleration, was noted for his kind stance by Christians in the Middle East as well as Christians back in Europe. He and his opponent, King Richard the Lionheart, had amicable personal relations in spite of their militant adversity towards each others' political aspirations.
A:If Christmas celebrations were limited to those people who could prove they are Christians then Eid could be promulgated those people who could prove they are Muslims, Saturnalia for to those people who could prove they are atheists, and so on, presumably with the same rights to public holidays in each case. So many different holidays could be unworkable socially, but it would provide fairness, and we must remember that fairness is important to Christians as part of the doctrine of loving their neighbours and even their enemies. Or we could stick with the present system, even if it gives an unfair advantage to Christians.
Yes. Depending on your definition of "near" it could be something as close to the Old City as Gologotha, which is holy to Christians or it could be just outside of the city limits like the Tomb of Samuel, which is holy for Jews. Of course, Jerusalem itself has numerous holy sites for Jews, Christians, and Muslims within its walls.
The Crusades were a series of religious wars fought between Christians and Muslims over control of holy lands in the Middle East. Both sides believed they had a divine right to these lands, leading to conflicts fueled by religious fervor, political ambition, and territorial expansion. The First Crusade was launched in 1096 by European Christians seeking to reclaim Jerusalem, which was under Muslim rule at the time.