Rhinos only bear a passing resemblance to Triceratops because of their bulky bodies and the horns on their faces. They are not related to Triceratops, however. Rhinos are mammals, while Triceratops were dinosaurian reptiles. No mammals have evolved from dinosaurs, rhinos included. In short, they appear slightly similar just because of coincidence.
No! a rhino is a mammal a triceratops was a reptile. That means a rhino was born alive and triceratops was hatched from a egg
Probably the African black rhino.
Well you people would probably think that the rhino could beat an anaconda. But their is a 90% that the anaconda could beat the rhino. The rhino is faster then a snake of course but just with a little bite the rhino is poisoned. Then is the chance of the snake to capitalize and get wrapped around the rhino. The power of the snake is unstoppable and that's why the snake could beat the rhino.
Yes, but they're some ways apart. The white Rhino is a grazer, feeds mainly on grass whlie the black rhino is a browser and feed mainly on leaves and branches.
A rhino could flip a gorilla
yes they could
A rhino is a unicorn with no wings. Sorry, not that good.
I thought Rhino was a virus that could kill you.
Only if it attacked from the back of the woolly rhino.
Triceratops was a ceratopsian. All ceratopsians were herbivorous. They probably ate plants such as cycads and conifers.
as fat as you want them to be
A hippo they can reach speeds of 15km per hour and a rhino does 10kms
The rhino. It could easily kill the tiger with its sharp horn. If the tiger tries to attack from behind, the rhino would kick it off.