No. It would not be an infringement of copyright but only because characters are not eligible for copyright protection, only the expression of those characters is.
Your drawing would, in all likelihood be a violation of trademark.
The physical and psychological characteristics/traits .
He is a fictitious, animated, two dimensional drawing so I suppose whatever you're defining as a "fantasy character", Bart falls under that category.
It's animated, first by drawing.
No. But, in all likelihood it would be a violation of trademark
It's a type of drawing. I know that anime is animated and manga is the drawing/book version.
drawing and creating new animated cartoons
they may be expensive because people have no more money from making the production happen, you know, with all the animators, and drawing the same character over and over for days.
Animated means brought to life or to give life too as in a cartoon when a drawing is brought to life.
Disneyland - 1954 The Story of the Animated Drawing 2-11 was released on: USA: 30 November 1955 Finland: 22 May 1959
yes and no. yes because when something is made it is copyrighted. no because as long as you don't take credit for it and make sure that the artist who made also get credit. so you are safe as long as you give credit for the persons work.
The first animated commercial was created by J. Stuart Blackton in 1906 for a brand of chewing gum called "Wrigley's." This short film, titled "The Enchanted Drawing," featured a live-action sequence where Blackton drew a cartoon character that came to life. It marked a significant milestone in advertising by combining animation with commercial promotion, paving the way for future animated advertisements.
pie band