It could, but the inefficiency and huge risks mean it shouldn't.
Nuclear energy is used to produce steam. This steam used to rotate turbines
In a nuclear reactor, nuclear energy is converted to thermal energy. The thermal energy is used to heat water to make steam which can be used to spin turbines. The turbines spin electrical generators. A lot of electric power comes from nuclear power plants.
Nuclear power, atomic power used to be the term used but is now not used so much.
the energy released during nuclear fission or fusion, esp. when used to gnerate electricity.
nuclear fission
Uranium is used as nuclear fuel in nuclear reactors.
Magnesium is not used in the nuclear energy.
Radiant energy could be used as home is boiling a pot of water.
Nuclear fuel is the fuel used to produce nuclear energy.
I don't see any reason to think nuclear energy could be used more efficiently there than elsewhere
Nuclear energy is used to produce steam. This steam used to rotate turbines
Saying nuclear energy is like saying Norwegian furniture. Nuclear power/energy is used everywhere, in 2009 20% of all electricity in the US was nuclear origin.
We use nuclear fission in nuclear reactors to tap nuclear energy.
Nuclear energy is released as heat in the fuel of a nuclear reactor, but only when the reactor has been brought to criticality and the chain reaction started. At that point the heat must be used, it can't be stored and used later. Before criticality is established, the reactor is shutdown and producing no nuclear heat from fission, so you could regard it as having potential nuclear energy in that state
No, nuclear energy is only used to make electricity
Nuclear energy generated by nuclear fissions of nuclear fuels.
Nuclear energy is used to produce electrical energy, but there is no direct relationship