Yes they could, "As time went on, there became few legal differences between the plebeians and the patricians. The plebeians could be elected to the senate and even be consuls."
Thanks,
Unknown
The plebeian tribunes, the representatives of the plebeians , could block the actions of the executive officer of state if he seemed them to be against the interests of the plebeians or harmful to them. They could also veto the seantum consultum. This was a deliberation of the senate on policy matters which had an advisory character for the consuls, the two annually elected heads of the Republic.
At the beginning of the Republic the consulship (and therefore the dictatorship as well) was open to the plebeians. About 30% of consuls from 509 BC to 486 BC were plebeians. No plebeians were appointed as dictators in that period. After this, there was what has been called the "closing of the patriciate." Other elite men were excluded from the offices of state and consuls were exclusively patricians.The Lex Licinia Sextia which was passed in 376 BC and enacted in 367 BC opened up the consulship to plebeians and reserved one of the two positions for the consuls for the year to plebeians. Lucius Sextius Lateranus, one of the two plebeian tribunes who tabled the bill for this law, became the first plebeian consul in 366 BC. After this, the dictatorship became accessible to former consuls who were plebeians. The first plebeian dictator was Quintus Publilius Philo who was appointed in 339 BC.
The power of veto was not just restricted to the consuls. All officers of state (consuls, praetors, censors, aediles and quaestors) had the power of veto. Officers of the same rank could veto each other and officers of higher rank could veto officers of lower rank. The tribune of the plebeians, who was the representative of the plebeians (commoners), but not an officer of state, also had to power of veto. The power to veto the actions of officers of state was the Roman system of checks and balances of power. It was meant to reduce the chance that the officers would abuse their power. The power of veto of the tribune of the plebeians was also meant to prevent the abuse of the commoners by the state.
At different times the consuls were different. At the beginning of the republic the consuls were all patricians from wealthy families. Over time, the plebeians were allowed to be elected to the office and by the later part of the republic one consul had to be a patrician and his partner had to be a plebeian. At any rate, they had to be wealthy men in order to be able to finance their political careers.At different times the consuls were different. At the beginning of the republic the consuls were all patricians from wealthy families. Over time, the plebeians were allowed to be elected to the office and by the later part of the republic one consul had to be a patrician and his partner had to be a plebeian. At any rate, they had to be wealthy men in order to be able to finance their political careers.At different times the consuls were different. At the beginning of the republic the consuls were all patricians from wealthy families. Over time, the plebeians were allowed to be elected to the office and by the later part of the republic one consul had to be a patrician and his partner had to be a plebeian. At any rate, they had to be wealthy men in order to be able to finance their political careers.At different times the consuls were different. At the beginning of the republic the consuls were all patricians from wealthy families. Over time, the plebeians were allowed to be elected to the office and by the later part of the republic one consul had to be a patrician and his partner had to be a plebeian. At any rate, they had to be wealthy men in order to be able to finance their political careers.At different times the consuls were different. At the beginning of the republic the consuls were all patricians from wealthy families. Over time, the plebeians were allowed to be elected to the office and by the later part of the republic one consul had to be a patrician and his partner had to be a plebeian. At any rate, they had to be wealthy men in order to be able to finance their political careers.At different times the consuls were different. At the beginning of the republic the consuls were all patricians from wealthy families. Over time, the plebeians were allowed to be elected to the office and by the later part of the republic one consul had to be a patrician and his partner had to be a plebeian. At any rate, they had to be wealthy men in order to be able to finance their political careers.At different times the consuls were different. At the beginning of the republic the consuls were all patricians from wealthy families. Over time, the plebeians were allowed to be elected to the office and by the later part of the republic one consul had to be a patrician and his partner had to be a plebeian. At any rate, they had to be wealthy men in order to be able to finance their political careers.At different times the consuls were different. At the beginning of the republic the consuls were all patricians from wealthy families. Over time, the plebeians were allowed to be elected to the office and by the later part of the republic one consul had to be a patrician and his partner had to be a plebeian. At any rate, they had to be wealthy men in order to be able to finance their political careers.At different times the consuls were different. At the beginning of the republic the consuls were all patricians from wealthy families. Over time, the plebeians were allowed to be elected to the office and by the later part of the republic one consul had to be a patrician and his partner had to be a plebeian. At any rate, they had to be wealthy men in order to be able to finance their political careers.
The partricians were the original Roman aristocracy, created under the monarchy. These were old senatorial families. The plebeians were non-patricians, the mass of Roman citizens, who had their own officials (eg. tribunes of the plebs). However, plebeians could be very wealthy, and towards the later part of the Roman Republic they gained considerable power. For example, a law was introduced that one of the two consuls (the most powerful position in Rome) had to be a plebeian, and often both consuls would be plebeian.
In the Early Republic, apart from a short period when 30% of the consuls were plebeians, all the consuls were patricians (aristocrats). In 367 BC, the Lex (law) Licinia Sextia provided that at least one consul each year should be a plebeian. The plebeians were the commoners, all non-patricians. The term covered both the rich and the poor. Only rich plebeians became consuls.
gave plebeians the right to serve as consuls
The plebeian tribunes, the representatives of the plebeians , could block the actions of the executive officer of state if he seemed them to be against the interests of the plebeians or harmful to them. They could also veto the seantum consultum. This was a deliberation of the senate on policy matters which had an advisory character for the consuls, the two annually elected heads of the Republic.
At the beginning of the Republic the consulship (and therefore the dictatorship as well) was open to the plebeians. About 30% of consuls from 509 BC to 486 BC were plebeians. No plebeians were appointed as dictators in that period. After this, there was what has been called the "closing of the patriciate." Other elite men were excluded from the offices of state and consuls were exclusively patricians.The Lex Licinia Sextia which was passed in 376 BC and enacted in 367 BC opened up the consulship to plebeians and reserved one of the two positions for the consuls for the year to plebeians. Lucius Sextius Lateranus, one of the two plebeian tribunes who tabled the bill for this law, became the first plebeian consul in 366 BC. After this, the dictatorship became accessible to former consuls who were plebeians. The first plebeian dictator was Quintus Publilius Philo who was appointed in 339 BC.
consuls
The representatives of the plebeians (the commoners) were the plebeian tribunes. They were not representatives in the Roman senate. They were actually excluded from the seats of the senate. The institutions of the plebeians (the plebeian tribunes, the plebeian aediles, their assistants, and the Plebeian Council, the assembly of the plebeians to which the patrician aristocracy was excluded) were separate and independent from the institutions of the Roman state: the senate and the magistrates, or officers of state (the consuls, praetors, censors, curule aediles and quaestors). The senate was controlled by the patrician aristocracy and the wealthy entrepreneurial class, the equestrians. These tribunes presided over the Plebeian Council and could propose bills to the vote of this assembly (plebiscites). One of their tasks was to protect the plebeians from abuse by the officers of state through 'intercessio' , the right to stop actions deemed to be harmful to the plebeians. They could also veto a senatum consultum. This was a written opinion on bills which were submitted to the senate for consultation by the consuls or praetors (these were bills that were going to be put to the vote of the Assembly of the Soldiers). Although these were meant to be just advice, the consuls often followed them to the letter. If the plebeian tribunes deemed them to be against the interests of the plebeians, they could veto them.
The patrician elders who advised the consuls in the Early republic were the senators. Later, rich plebeians were also allowed to become senators.
The power of veto was not just restricted to the consuls. All officers of state (consuls, praetors, censors, aediles and quaestors) had the power of veto. Officers of the same rank could veto each other and officers of higher rank could veto officers of lower rank. The tribune of the plebeians, who was the representative of the plebeians (commoners), but not an officer of state, also had to power of veto. The power to veto the actions of officers of state was the Roman system of checks and balances of power. It was meant to reduce the chance that the officers would abuse their power. The power of veto of the tribune of the plebeians was also meant to prevent the abuse of the commoners by the state.
The power of veto was not just restricted to the consuls. All officers of state (consuls, praetors, censors, aediles and quaestors) had the power of veto. Officers of the same rank could veto each other and officers of higher rank could veto officers of lower rank. The tribune of the plebeians, who was the representative of the plebeians (commoners), but not an officer of state, also had to power of veto. The power to veto the actions of officers of state was the Roman system of checks and balances of power. It was meant to reduce the chance that the officers would abuse their power. The power of veto of the tribune of the plebeians was also meant to prevent the abuse of the commoners by the state.
The representatives of the plebeians (the commoners) were the plebeian tribunes. They were not representatives in the Roman senate. They were actually excluded from the seats of the senate. The institutions of the plebeians (the plebeian tribunes, the plebeian aediles, their assistants, and the Plebeian Council, the assembly of the plebeians to which the patrician aristocracy was excluded) were separate and independent from the institutions of the Roman state: the senate and the magistrates, or officers of state (the consuls, praetors, censors, curule aediles and quaestors). The senate was controlled by the patrician aristocracy and the wealthy entrepreneurial class, the equestrians. These tribunes presided over the Plebeian Council and could propose bills to the vote of this assembly (plebiscites). One of their tasks was to protect the plebeians from abuse by the officers of state through 'intercessio' , the right to stop actions deemed to be harmful to the plebeians. They could also veto a senatum consultum. This was a written opinion on bills which were submitted to the senate for consultation by the consuls or praetors (these were bills that were going to be put to the vote of the Assembly of the Soldiers). Although these were meant to be just advice, the consuls often followed them to the letter. If the plebeian tribunes deemed them to be against the interests of the plebeians, they could veto them.
The power of veto was not just restricted to the consuls. All officers of state (consuls, praetors, censors, aediles and quaestors) had the power of veto. Officers of the same rank could veto each other and officers of higher rank could veto officers of lower rank. The tribune of the plebeians, who was the representative of the plebeians (commoners), but not an officer of state, also had to power of veto. The power to veto the actions of officers of state was the Roman system of checks and balances of power. It was meant to reduce the chance that the officers would abuse their power. The power of veto of the tribune of the plebeians was also meant to prevent the abuse of the commoners by the state.
At different times the consuls were different. At the beginning of the republic the consuls were all patricians from wealthy families. Over time, the plebeians were allowed to be elected to the office and by the later part of the republic one consul had to be a patrician and his partner had to be a plebeian. At any rate, they had to be wealthy men in order to be able to finance their political careers.At different times the consuls were different. At the beginning of the republic the consuls were all patricians from wealthy families. Over time, the plebeians were allowed to be elected to the office and by the later part of the republic one consul had to be a patrician and his partner had to be a plebeian. At any rate, they had to be wealthy men in order to be able to finance their political careers.At different times the consuls were different. At the beginning of the republic the consuls were all patricians from wealthy families. Over time, the plebeians were allowed to be elected to the office and by the later part of the republic one consul had to be a patrician and his partner had to be a plebeian. At any rate, they had to be wealthy men in order to be able to finance their political careers.At different times the consuls were different. At the beginning of the republic the consuls were all patricians from wealthy families. Over time, the plebeians were allowed to be elected to the office and by the later part of the republic one consul had to be a patrician and his partner had to be a plebeian. At any rate, they had to be wealthy men in order to be able to finance their political careers.At different times the consuls were different. At the beginning of the republic the consuls were all patricians from wealthy families. Over time, the plebeians were allowed to be elected to the office and by the later part of the republic one consul had to be a patrician and his partner had to be a plebeian. At any rate, they had to be wealthy men in order to be able to finance their political careers.At different times the consuls were different. At the beginning of the republic the consuls were all patricians from wealthy families. Over time, the plebeians were allowed to be elected to the office and by the later part of the republic one consul had to be a patrician and his partner had to be a plebeian. At any rate, they had to be wealthy men in order to be able to finance their political careers.At different times the consuls were different. At the beginning of the republic the consuls were all patricians from wealthy families. Over time, the plebeians were allowed to be elected to the office and by the later part of the republic one consul had to be a patrician and his partner had to be a plebeian. At any rate, they had to be wealthy men in order to be able to finance their political careers.At different times the consuls were different. At the beginning of the republic the consuls were all patricians from wealthy families. Over time, the plebeians were allowed to be elected to the office and by the later part of the republic one consul had to be a patrician and his partner had to be a plebeian. At any rate, they had to be wealthy men in order to be able to finance their political careers.At different times the consuls were different. At the beginning of the republic the consuls were all patricians from wealthy families. Over time, the plebeians were allowed to be elected to the office and by the later part of the republic one consul had to be a patrician and his partner had to be a plebeian. At any rate, they had to be wealthy men in order to be able to finance their political careers.