The War Between the states was not fought over slavery but instead state rights. This does not mean the South did not use slaves in the war, but the south offered slaves a chance to earn freedom if they served in the war, even though only ten percent of southerners were slaves at the time. So to answer this question more directly, yes slaves were not needed in the war but the use of slavery helped the south fight for what they believed in. Which might not have been right to today's society but back then it was a fair trade for slaves to fight and earn freedom.
Could the colonies labor problem have been solved without slavery?
Cotton production could not have been done profitably without slavery.
more people could have fought for abolition. And we could have made peace with them.
The south was afraid that without slavery their economy would die. They were also afraid that the African Americans could out weigh them.
It kept the British out. After the proclamation, they could not intervene on the side of the Confederates without looking pro-slavery.
The South was concerned how their way of life would be if Lincoln ended slavery. They couldn't imagine a society without slavery
The issue of slavery could have been solved without war by people realizing that all people are equal no matter the color of their skin. If people realized this, then the slaves would have been let go with no problems.
They fought in the middle, if possible, so they could be seen.They fought in the middle, if possible, so they could be seen.They fought in the middle, if possible, so they could be seen.They fought in the middle, if possible, so they could be seen.They fought in the middle, if possible, so they could be seen.They fought in the middle, if possible, so they could be seen.They fought in the middle, if possible, so they could be seen.They fought in the middle, if possible, so they could be seen.They fought in the middle, if possible, so they could be seen.
Chinchonmatajanña
This was Lincoln's way of turning the war into an official crusade against slavery, so that Britain and France could not support the South without looking pro-slavery themselves.
A euphemism for slavery could be "forced labor" or "bonded labor." These terms are sometimes used to describe situations where individuals are coerced into working without proper compensation or freedom.
yes, cause someone in charge might could start segragation and slavery, without it.