Well, the country that I know uses direct democracy is Switzerland so yeah...
Australia
Pros of direct democracy include increased citizen participation, more direct representation, and potential for greater accountability of government officials. However, cons can include the risk of majority tyranny, potential for uninformed decision-making, and inefficiency in decision-making due to the need to involve all citizens in the process.
having to decide for yourself what the laws are
One inherent problem in direct democracy is tabulating the votes of the entire populace. There is no way to have a direct democracy without having a mechanism to tabulate and measure the votes.
The basic features and limitations of Greek democracy included the women, slaves, and poor having no rights in any form. It was a direct democracy and only men who were land owners were allowed to vote.
The representative and direct democracy are the SAME thing, but are called by different names.
Ancient Athens is known for having a direct democracy, which is when the people directly vote on the laws. There are no representatives, the people meet together and run the government themselves.
Direct democracy is when the voters themselves hold the power. For instance, instead of having one person (a representative) present an idea to the governing body, regular people themselves propose bills and then vote on it, instead of having a group of representatives propose and vote on bills.
Due to more citizens wanting Democracy in their countries through revolution.
It is only most affective in an extremely small nation, where everyone is capable of having an equal vote on anything that ever happens.
If you don't have people who can think for themselves, there is no point in having a democracy. Democracy depends on having people who can think for themselves rather than believing..