Want this question answered?
Never. Only the restrained person can be in violation. The order of protection does not protect the restrained person.Another View: The above is not necessarily true in all instances. In some states the plaintiff may also be held in contempt of the order if the plaintiff uses the order as a 'weapon' to bully the respondant by either inventing circumstances or purposely placing themselves in situations where the respondant must flee or leave a location in order to avoid being found in violation of the "distance rule" or whatever restriction the plaintiff is trying to use to harass them.
There is not order against the plaintiff.. the plaintiff is the person who filed the order, he or she is not in violation of an order that they placed. Only the defendant can be in violation as the courts have ordered that person to have no contact with the plaintiff not vice versa.Another View: The Plaintiff MAY, in fact, be in violation of the court's order. If the respondant was ordered to maintain a certain distance from the plaintiff, or stay away from the plaintiff's residence and place of work, or was ordered not to have any contact with the plaintiff,. . . AND THEN. . . the plaintiff wilfully violates the same order they petitioned for, the court can find them in violation of the order and they are in contempt of court.
Do not make contact! The other person broke the restrain order. Not you. But if YOU make contact YOU broke the order and can be charged with a misdemeanor. Added: Maintain records of any calls from the plaintiff. You could use them against the plaintiff at trial.
The executor of the estate will usually be substituted in as the plaintiff.
If a Plaintiff contacts you during a no-contact order, you should not respond and avoid engaging with them in any way. Any communication should be reported to your attorney or the court overseeing the no-contact order so they can take appropriate action to ensure the terms of the order are upheld. Violating a no-contact order can have legal consequences, so it's important to follow the terms of the order strictly.
You or your attorney must raise that issue during the hearing. You provide evidence to show the plaintiff is lying to the court or ask the court to order the plaintiff to provide proof of their claim. You do not wait until the matter is over to claim the plaintiff lied.You or your attorney must raise that issue during the hearing. You provide evidence to show the plaintiff is lying to the court or ask the court to order the plaintiff to provide proof of their claim. You do not wait until the matter is over to claim the plaintiff lied.You or your attorney must raise that issue during the hearing. You provide evidence to show the plaintiff is lying to the court or ask the court to order the plaintiff to provide proof of their claim. You do not wait until the matter is over to claim the plaintiff lied.You or your attorney must raise that issue during the hearing. You provide evidence to show the plaintiff is lying to the court or ask the court to order the plaintiff to provide proof of their claim. You do not wait until the matter is over to claim the plaintiff lied.
The question makes no sense. There is no payment of a restraining order. To obtain a restraining order, you either contact your local law enforcement agency and have a temporary order filed, or you motion the courts for an order, in which case you pay a motion fee to the court. Nothing is paid to the plaintiff, and the only reason your landlord would be involved is if he is the plaintiff or the defendant.
What happens if both parties violate a restraining order?
The plaintiff should contact the PA child support agency.
An Anton Piller order is a court order allowing a plaintiff to go to someone's premises and seize documents.
If there is an active restraining order against you, then you may not.Added: The law doesn't say that you can't retain "ownership" of it, just that you may NOT have possession of it, or access to it.
I am the Plaintiff a Pro Se who submitted Production of Documents and Interrogratory's to the Defendants in a Employment Race Discrimination case. The Defendants refuse to comply with the Court and release to the Plaintiff the Interrogratorys and Production of Documents. The Plaintiff has to write a Motion to Suppress release to the Court in order to get the Court to order the Defendants to complay. How dose the Plaintiff write a Motion to Suppress?