Disproportionate use of resources in achieving secondary or minor objectives, potentially undermining achievement of wider aims and objectives
Loss of focus on the wider vision and aims of the whole undertaking. This can lead to 'strategic drift'.
Particularly in partner undertakings, it can lead to sudden breakdown in leadership, control, and joint working. Resources (time, money, personnel, materials, assets) no longer working efficiently.
The only dangers are trying to be implemented to early. That has lead to authoritative governments like in the ussr. No country has ever achieved communism. The only safe way to do it is to do it worldwide and first developing sociailist systems and fully develope socialism in governments across the world. In communism itself there arent many dangers
The government connot interfere with economy
consumer product safty commission
When items are required on a breakdown basis and find out that there is not enough stock as a result of reducing it, this could lead to loss of production.
In 1950s people moved to suburbs to save money. Some cities had good transformation and of the people had cars.
i need the answer as well plz :(
The removal of those judged to be criminals from society as a whole. Punishment of the individual instead of rehabilitation.
There are no dangers!!
some of them dangers
Dangers could potentially be fires
what are the dangers of running away
the dangers of overeating are diabetes, hypertesion.
the dangers in denmark are ki guage
What are the dangers in the rockie mountains?
the tundra biome dangers
None they don't have any dangers
the dangers on mount mckinley are terrible